H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Barbara Hallquist vs Eva Pfaff H2H: 1-1
Barbara Hallquist and Eva Pfaff are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Eva Pfaff leads 1–0 on grass, while Barbara Hallquist leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Eva Pfaff won the 1982 Sydney third round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 69
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 65
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 1982* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Eva Pfaff | 6-3 6-0 | Barbara Hallquist | Match data |
| Aug 17, 1981 | Toronto | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Barbara Hallquist | 6-1 4-6 6-2 | Eva Pfaff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Hallquist | — | — | — | 1,778 | 67 | 90 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Eva Pfaff | #420 | #17 | 21 | 1,902 | 155 | 202 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Hallquist | Eva Pfaff | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1973 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1974 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1975 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1977 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1978 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 18–22 | 45.0% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1979 | 3–13 | 18.8% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 31–21 | 59.6% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1980 | 14–13 | 51.9% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1981 | 14–17 | 45.2% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1982 | 12–14 | 46.2% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #58 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1983 | 5–16 | 23.8% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #74 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #104 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #203 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |