H2H data updated: 2026-10-25 00:00 UTC

Barbara Hallquist vs Kate Latham H2H: 1-2

Kate Latham holds a 2–1 lead over Barbara Hallquist in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kate Latham leads 2–0 on grass, while Barbara Hallquist leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kate Latham won the 1982 Wimbledon round of 64 7-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Barbara Hallquist
USA Age 69
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Kate Latham
USA Age 74

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kate Latham 7-6 6-3 Barbara Hallquist Match data Jun 25, 1982* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Barbara Hallquist 5-7 6-3 7-6 Kate Latham Match data Oct 8, 1981* R32 Tampa WTA 250 Hard
Kate Latham 6-4 3-6 7-5 Barbara Hallquist Match data Jun 21, 1978* R64 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Barbara Hallquist — — — 1,778 67 90 42.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kate Latham — — — 1,865 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbara Hallquist Kate Latham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,516 0 0 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 1974 2–3 40.0% — 1,500 0 0 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0
18 1975 3–1 75.0% — 1,541 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,530 0 0 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
20 1977 4–2 66.7% — 1,577 0 0 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0
21 1978 8–9 47.1% — 1,616 0 0 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3
22 1979 3–13 18.8% — 1,565 0 0 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3
23 1980 14–13 51.9% — 1,703 0 0 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3
24 1981 14–17 45.2% — 1,737 0 0 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,749 0 3
25 1982 12–14 46.2% — 1,707 0 0 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,662 0 3
26 1983 5–16 23.8% — 1,567 0 0 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,853 0 3
27 — — — — — — — 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,750 0 4
28 — — — — — — — 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,775 0 5
29 — — — — — — — 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,685 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,624 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,493 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,527 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Barbara Hallquist Kate Latham
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1973 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1975 — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1977 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
21 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1979 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
23 1980 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1981 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 7 6 13 53.8% 0 5 5 0.0% 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1982 7 5 12 58.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
26 1983 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 34 38 72 47.2% 3 12 15 20.0% 22 28 50 44.0% 1 9 10 10.0% — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Barbara Hallquist Kate Latham
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1973 1516 110.1 — — — — +80 — — 66.7% +2.33 — — — +0.83 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07
17 1974 1500 97.3 — — — — +94 — — 38.5% -0.85 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +1.26 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42
18 1975 1541 102.9 — — — — — — +36 60.0% +0.60 2–0 1–1 — +0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1976 1530 102.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.08 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.61
20 1977 1578 113.0 — — — — — — — 57.1% +0.21 2–0 1–0 — +0.30 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26
21 1978 1616 117.7 — — — — +29 — -43 48.6% -0.16 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.13 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.17
22 1979 1566 114.8 — — — — +87 — -68 27.0% -1.76 3–4 (43%) 0–1 — -0.92 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.71
23 1980 1704 131.6 — — — — -27 -213 -91 52.4% -0.19 4–5 (44%) 6–1 (86%) 104.8 -1.47 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.34
24 1981 1737 128.5 — — — — -9 — -69 43.2% -0.74 8–4 (67%) 2–0 — -2.02 1977 1750 140.9 — — — — -8 -120 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -1.23
25 1982 1708 102.3 — — — — -1 -251 -62 44.1% -0.80 5–2 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 102.9 -0.55 1978 1663 118.4 — — — — +3 -12 +67 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +1.97
26 1983 1568 105.1 — — — — +49 -96 +31 28.3% -1.37 1–3 (25%) 0–3 (0%) 93.9 +0.62 1979 1853 149.7 — — — — -20 -164 -98 46.0% -0.27 8–6 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 103.8 -2.28
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1750 133.2 — — — — -27 — +15 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.93
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1776 142.9 — — — — -18 — +4 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.97
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1686 128.3 — — — — +50 -103 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.20
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1624 115.1 — — — — +52 -49 +72 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.86
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1493 91.7 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.46
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05
Career — 1778 121.7 — — — — +21 -189 -53 43.1% -0.66 30–22 (58%) 16–12 (57%) 106.7 -0.71 — 1866 138.2 — — — — -3 -78 -9 49.2% -0.03 56–61 (48%) 41–38 (52%) 101.2 +0.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.