H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Barbara Hallquist vs Leigh Anne Thompson H2H: 1-0

Barbara Hallquist holds a 1–0 lead over Leigh Anne Thompson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Barbara Hallquist leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbara Hallquist won the 1982 Deerfield Beach round of 32 6-1 6-3.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Barbara Hallquist 6-1 6-3 Leigh Anne Thompson Match data Oct 7, 1982* R32 Deerfield Beach WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Barbara Hallquist 1,777 67 90 42.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Leigh Anne Thompson 1,792 42 73 36.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbara Hallquist Leigh Anne Thompson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1973 2–1 66.7% 1,516 0 0
17 1974 2–3 40.0% 1,500 0 0 1981 4–5 44.4% 1,542 0 0
18 1975 3–1 75.0% 1,541 0 0 1982 20–23 46.5% 1,765 0 1
19 1976 0–1 0.0% 1,530 0 0 1983 7–17 29.2% 1,715 0 1
20 1977 4–2 66.7% 1,577 0 0 1984 0–8 0.0% 1,589 0 1
21 1978 8–9 47.1% 1,615 0 0 1985 6–11 35.3% 1,594 0 1
22 1979 3–13 18.8% 1,564 0 0 1986 5–9 35.7% 1,555 0 1
23 1980 14–13 51.9% 1,702 0 0
24 1981 14–17 45.2% 1,736 0 0
25 1982 12–14 46.2% 1,706 0 0
26 1983 5–16 23.8% 1,567 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Barbara Hallquist Leigh Anne Thompson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1973 2 1 3 66.7%
17 1974 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1975 3 1 4 75.0% 1982 7 2 9 77.8% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 6 9 15 40.0%
19 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 1 4 5 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 8 12 33.3%
20 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 1984 0 5 5 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1985 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1979 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1986 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 1980 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
24 1981 7 6 13 53.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 5 5 0.0%
25 1982 7 5 12 58.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
26 1983 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
Career 34 38 72 47.2% 3 12 15 20.0% 22 28 50 44.0% 1 9 10 10.0% 16 25 41 39.0% 13 20 33 39.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 13 22 35 37.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Barbara Hallquist Leigh Anne Thompson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1973 1516 110.1 +80 66.7% +2.33 +0.83
17 1974 1500 97.3 +94 38.5% -0.85 2–1 (67%) 0–1 +1.26 1981 1543 110.4 +61 +27 47.6% 0.00 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +0.41
18 1975 1541 102.9 +36 60.0% +0.60 2–0 1–1 +0.62 1982 1765 135.1 +1 -160 -227 45.7% -0.04 5–5 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 100.7 -0.61
19 1976 1530 102.4 33.3% -1.00 0–1 +0.08 1983 1715 134.4 +4 -84 38.8% -0.96 0–5 (0%) 1–1 -2.18
20 1977 1578 113.0 57.1% +0.21 2–0 1–0 +0.31 1984 1590 92.8 +12 -27 11.1% -2.33 0–2 1–2 (33%) -0.15
21 1978 1615 117.4 +32 -43 48.6% -0.16 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) +0.27 1985 1594 115.3 +21 36.8% -0.66 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) +0.16
22 1979 1564 114.4 +88 -66 27.0% -1.76 3–4 (43%) 0–1 -0.88 1986 1556 101.1 -8 -18 43.8% -0.53 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 95.1 +1.93
23 1980 1702 131.2 -29 -211 -89 52.4% -0.19 4–5 (44%) 6–1 (86%) 104.8 -1.74
24 1981 1736 128.2 -10 -69 43.2% -0.74 8–4 (67%) 2–0 -2.03
25 1982 1707 102.0 -3 -250 -62 44.1% -0.80 5–2 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 102.8 -0.61
26 1983 1567 105.0 +48 -95 +32 28.3% -1.37 1–3 (25%) 0–3 (0%) 93.9 +0.68
Career 1777 121.4 +20 -188 -52 43.1% -0.66 30–22 (58%) 16–12 (57%) 106.6 -0.77 1793 126.6 +9 -96 -227 40.5% -0.53 10–22 (31%) 9–13 (41%) 89.9 -0.39

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.