H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Barbara Hallquist vs Patricia Hy Boulais H2H: 1-0

Barbara Hallquist holds a 1–0 lead over Patricia Hy Boulais in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Barbara Hallquist leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Barbara Hallquist won the 1983 Tokyo Queen's round of 32 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Barbara Hallquist
USA Age 69
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Patricia Hy Boulais
CAN Age 61 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Barbara Hallquist 6-3 7-5 Patricia Hy Boulais Match data Sep 15, 1983* R32 Tokyo Queen's WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Barbara Hallquist — — — 1,777 67 90 42.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Patricia Hy Boulais — — — 1,906 142 165 46.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbara Hallquist Patricia Hy Boulais
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
16 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,516 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1974 2–3 40.0% — 1,500 0 0 1983 7–8 46.7% — 1,546 0 0
18 1975 3–1 75.0% — 1,541 0 0 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,522 0 0
19 1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1977 4–2 66.7% — 1,577 0 0 1986 8–1 88.9% — 1,633 0 1
21 1978 8–9 47.1% — 1,615 0 0 1987 9–15 37.5% — 1,594 0 1
22 1979 3–13 18.8% — 1,564 0 0 1988 0–5 0.0% — 1,548 0 1
23 1980 14–13 51.9% — 1,702 0 0 1989 1–4 20.0% — 1,514 0 1
24 1981 14–17 45.2% — 1,736 0 0 1990 7–7 50.0% — 1,573 0 1
25 1982 12–14 46.2% — 1,706 0 0 1991 18–17 51.4% — 1,704 0 1
26 1983 5–16 23.8% — 1,567 0 0 1992 22–16 57.9% — 1,876 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 1993 21–15 58.3% — 1,851 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 1994 15–16 48.4% — 1,756 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1995 11–14 44.0% — 1,691 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 1996 10–16 38.5% — 1,687 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1997 12–19 38.7% — 1,663 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1998 1–8 11.1% — 1,573 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Barbara Hallquist Patricia Hy Boulais
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1973 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1974 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1983 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1975 — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1977 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — 5 0 5 100.0%
21 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1979 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1988 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1980 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1989 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1981 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 7 6 13 53.8% 0 5 5 0.0% 1990 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 1982 7 5 12 58.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 1991 13 11 24 54.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1983 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 8 5 13 61.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 10 9 19 52.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 11 9 20 55.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 5 8 13 38.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1 7 8 12.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 34 38 72 47.2% 3 12 15 20.0% 22 28 50 44.0% 1 9 10 10.0% — 72 85 157 45.9% 28 39 67 41.8% 27 23 50 54.0% 15 18 33 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Barbara Hallquist Patricia Hy Boulais
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1493 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07
16 1973 1516 110.1 — — — — +80 — — 66.7% +2.33 — — — +0.83 1982 1477 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.18
17 1974 1500 97.3 — — — — +94 — — 38.5% -0.85 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +1.26 1983 1546 117.5 — — — — +51 — +83 46.9% +0.12 1–1 1–1 — +0.93
18 1975 1541 102.9 — — — — — — +36 60.0% +0.60 2–0 1–1 — +0.62 1984 1523 101.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 0–1 — +0.06
19 1976 1530 102.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1977 1578 113.0 — — — — — — — 57.1% +0.21 2–0 1–0 — +0.31 1986 1633 110.5 — — — — +41 — — 69.6% +1.65 5–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) — +2.61
21 1978 1615 117.4 — — — — +32 — -43 48.6% -0.16 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.27 1987 1595 115.4 — — — — +48 — +10 37.5% -0.93 5–3 (63%) 1–6 (14%) 97.9 -0.17
22 1979 1564 114.4 — — — — +88 — -66 27.0% -1.76 3–4 (43%) 0–1 — -0.88 1988 1548 99.0 — — — — +29 — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–2 — -0.27
23 1980 1702 131.2 — — — — -29 -211 -89 52.4% -0.19 4–5 (44%) 6–1 (86%) 104.8 -1.74 1989 1515 91.9 — — — — +9 — — 20.0% -2.30 — — — +0.31
24 1981 1736 128.2 — — — — -10 — -69 43.2% -0.74 8–4 (67%) 2–0 — -2.03 1990 1574 118.5 — — — — +7 — — 51.7% +0.41 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.67
25 1982 1707 102.0 — — — — -3 -250 -62 44.1% -0.80 5–2 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 102.8 -0.61 1991 1704 141.1 — — — — -20 -265 +2 50.0% +0.11 6–4 (60%) 2–1 (67%) 104.8 -0.45
26 1983 1567 105.0 — — — — +48 -95 +32 28.3% -1.37 1–3 (25%) 0–3 (0%) 93.9 +0.68 1992 1877 155.6 — — — — -71 -231 -109 56.3% +0.35 7–3 (70%) 2–2 (50%) 107.4 -1.82
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1852 141.8 — — — — -46 -170 +3 57.0% +0.38 6–3 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 105.0 -1.32
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1756 132.7 — — — — +24 -99 — 52.4% +0.25 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.3 -0.60
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1691 125.6 — — — — +15 -27 — 50.0% -0.18 3–9 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 93.7 +0.06
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1687 132.9 — — — — -41 -41 +161 40.0% -0.73 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 -1.41
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1664 129.6 — — — — -71 +1 +194 40.3% -0.58 8–7 (53%) 2–5 (29%) 99.0 -0.88
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1574 92.9 — — — — -25 -9 — 26.1% -2.00 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.04
Career — 1777 121.4 — — — — +20 -188 -52 43.1% -0.66 30–22 (58%) 16–12 (57%) 106.6 -0.77 — 1906 138.1 — — — — -10 -116 +43 47.1% -0.18 50–44 (53%) 22–33 (40%) 98.3 -0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.