H2H data updated: 2026-10-25 00:00 UTC

Barbara Hallquist vs Renee Richards H2H: 1-0

Barbara Hallquist holds a 1–0 lead over Renee Richards in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Barbara Hallquist leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbara Hallquist won the 1980 Phoenix round of 64 6-3 6-0.

H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 92 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Barbara Hallquist 6-3 6-0 Renee Richards Match data Oct 8, 1980* R64 Phoenix WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Barbara Hallquist — — — 1,778 67 90 42.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Renee Richards — — — 1,865 117 86 57.6% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbara Hallquist Renee Richards
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,516 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1974 2–3 40.0% — 1,500 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1975 3–1 75.0% — 1,541 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1977 4–2 66.7% — 1,577 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1978 8–9 47.1% — 1,616 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1979 3–13 18.8% — 1,565 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1980 14–13 51.9% — 1,703 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1981 14–17 45.2% — 1,737 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1982 12–14 46.2% — 1,707 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1983 5–16 23.8% — 1,567 0 0 — — — — — — —
41 — — — — — — — 1976 12–2 85.7% — 1,672 0 1
42 — — — — — — — 1977 24–10 70.6% — 1,831 0 2
43 — — — — — — — 1978 12–13 48.0% — 1,806 0 2
44 — — — — — — — 1979 17–24 41.5% — 1,833 0 2
45 — — — — — — — 1980 47–28 62.7% — 1,754 0 7
46 — — — — — — — 1981 5–8 38.5% — 1,698 0 8
47 — — — — — — — 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,672 0 8

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Barbara Hallquist Renee Richards
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1973 1516 110.1 — — — — +80 — — 66.7% +2.33 — — — +0.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 1500 97.3 — — — — +94 — — 38.5% -0.85 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +1.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1975 1541 102.9 — — — — — — +36 60.0% +0.60 2–0 1–1 — +0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1976 1530 102.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1977 1578 113.0 — — — — — — — 57.1% +0.21 2–0 1–0 — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1978 1616 117.7 — — — — +29 — -43 48.6% -0.16 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1979 1566 114.8 — — — — +87 — -68 27.0% -1.76 3–4 (43%) 0–1 — -0.92 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1980 1704 131.6 — — — — -27 -213 -91 52.4% -0.19 4–5 (44%) 6–1 (86%) 104.8 -1.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1981 1737 128.5 — — — — -9 — -69 43.2% -0.74 8–4 (67%) 2–0 — -2.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1982 1708 102.3 — — — — -1 -251 -62 44.1% -0.80 5–2 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 102.9 -0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1983 1568 105.1 — — — — +49 -96 +31 28.3% -1.37 1–3 (25%) 0–3 (0%) 93.9 +0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1673 122.7 — — — — +101 -97 — 80.0% +2.03 2–2 (50%) 2–0 — +3.45
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1831 138.9 — — — — +10 -169 — 69.0% +1.55 2–3 (40%) 1–6 (14%) 94.5 +3.57
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1807 138.1 — — — — -60 -73 — 41.5% -0.23 5–4 (56%) 5–4 (56%) 102.1 +0.28
44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1834 155.9 — — — — -81 -15 — 45.4% -0.38 5–10 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 96.0 -5.21
45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1755 139.7 — — — — +27 +23 — 60.1% +0.89 11–8 (58%) 2–7 (22%) 95.1 +1.52
46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1698 123.8 — — — — — +80 — 38.7% -0.61 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — -1.27
47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1672 91.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.16
Career — 1778 121.7 — — — — +21 -189 -53 43.1% -0.66 30–22 (58%) 16–12 (57%) 106.7 -0.71 — 1865 146.1 — — — — -9 -45 — 55.7% +0.53 28–29 (49%) 14–22 (39%) 94.2 +1.23

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.