H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Barbara Hallquist vs Sheila Mcinerney H2H: 1-1

Barbara Hallquist and Sheila Mcinerney are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sheila Mcinerney leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sheila Mcinerney won the 1977 US Open round of 64 7-5 6-0.

H2H
1 1
2 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sheila Mcinerney 7-5 6-0 Barbara Hallquist Match data Sep 3, 1977* R64 US Open Grand Slam Clay
Barbara Hallquist 6-2 7-5 Sheila Mcinerney Match data Jun 30, 1977* R16 Raleigh WTA 250

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Barbara Hallquist 1,777 67 90 42.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sheila Mcinerney 1,586 27 39 40.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbara Hallquist Sheila Mcinerney
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1973 2–1 66.7% 1,516 0 0
17 1974 2–3 40.0% 1,500 0 0
18 1975 3–1 75.0% 1,541 0 0
19 1976 0–1 0.0% 1,530 0 0 1977 2–2 50.0% 1,521 0 0
20 1977 4–2 66.7% 1,577 0 0 1978 2–5 28.6% 1,488 0 0
21 1978 8–9 47.1% 1,615 0 0 1979 1–2 33.3% 1,473 0 0
22 1979 3–13 18.8% 1,564 0 0 1980 3–9 25.0% 1,454 0 0
23 1980 14–13 51.9% 1,702 0 0 1981 10–7 58.8% 1,543 0 0
24 1981 14–17 45.2% 1,736 0 0 1982 8–13 38.1% 1,495 0 0
25 1982 12–14 46.2% 1,706 0 0 1983 1–1 50.0% 1,499 0 0
26 1983 5–16 23.8% 1,567 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Barbara Hallquist Sheila Mcinerney
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1973 2 1 3 66.7%
17 1974 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1975 3 1 4 75.0%
19 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1977 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1979 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1979 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1980 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1980 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 1981 7 6 13 53.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 5 5 0.0% 1982 0 3 3 0.0% 8 10 18 44.4%
25 1982 7 5 12 58.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1983 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1983 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
Career 34 38 72 47.2% 3 12 15 20.0% 22 28 50 44.0% 1 9 10 10.0% 2 10 12 16.7% 10 14 24 41.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Barbara Hallquist Sheila Mcinerney
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1973 1516 110.1 +80 66.7% +2.33 +0.83
17 1974 1500 97.3 +94 38.5% -0.85 2–1 (67%) 0–1 +1.26
18 1975 1541 102.9 +36 60.0% +0.60 2–0 1–1 +0.62
19 1976 1530 102.4 33.3% -1.00 0–1 +0.08 1977 1521 117.1 55.6% +0.67 0–1 +0.13
20 1977 1578 113.0 57.1% +0.21 2–0 1–0 +0.31 1978 1488 107.3 38.5% +0.15 0–1 0–2 +0.48
21 1978 1615 117.4 +32 -43 48.6% -0.16 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) +0.27 1979 1473 98.8 42.9% -0.14 0–1 +0.82
22 1979 1564 114.4 +88 -66 27.0% -1.76 3–4 (43%) 0–1 -0.88 1980 1455 103.3 +53 24.0% -2.08 1–0 1–2 (33%) +0.25
23 1980 1702 131.2 -29 -211 -89 52.4% -0.19 4–5 (44%) 6–1 (86%) 104.8 -1.74 1981 1543 116.0 +10 +59 57.1% +0.60 1–0 1–0 +0.88
24 1981 1736 128.2 -10 -69 43.2% -0.74 8–4 (67%) 2–0 -2.03 1982 1496 103.7 -26 +23 38.6% -0.95 1–3 (25%) 0–4 (0%) 93.8 +1.43
25 1982 1707 102.0 -3 -250 -62 44.1% -0.80 5–2 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 102.8 -0.61 1983 1499 99.0 40.0% -0.80 1–0 +0.33
26 1983 1567 105.0 +48 -95 +32 28.3% -1.37 1–3 (25%) 0–3 (0%) 93.9 +0.68
Career 1777 121.4 +20 -188 -52 43.1% -0.66 30–22 (58%) 16–12 (57%) 106.6 -0.77 1586 111.3 +27 +23 +59 42.0% -0.51 4–6 (40%) 2–8 (20%) 93.7 +6.55

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.