H2H data updated: 2026-10-19 00:00 UTC

Barbara Hallquist vs Sherry Acker H2H: 0-2

Sherry Acker holds a 2–0 lead over Barbara Hallquist in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sherry Acker leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sherry Acker won the 1980 Las Vegas round of 32 6-0 6-3.

H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sherry Acker 6-0 6-3 Barbara Hallquist Match data Sep 18, 1980* R32 Las Vegas WTA 250 Hard
Sherry Acker 6-2 2-6 Barbara Hallquist Match data Aug 9, 1979* R32 Indianapolis WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Barbara Hallquist — — — 1,778 67 90 42.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sherry Acker — — — 1,844 63 100 38.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbara Hallquist Sherry Acker
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,516 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1974 2–3 40.0% — 1,500 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1975 3–1 75.0% — 1,541 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1977 4–2 66.7% — 1,577 0 0 1979 13–21 38.2% — 1,591 0 0
21 1978 8–9 47.1% — 1,616 0 0 1980 29–31 48.3% — 1,832 0 0
22 1979 3–13 18.8% — 1,565 0 0 1981 8–19 29.6% — 1,682 0 0
23 1980 14–13 51.9% — 1,703 0 0 1982 1–5 16.7% — 1,632 0 0
24 1981 14–17 45.2% — 1,737 0 0 1983 11–15 42.3% — 1,619 0 0
25 1982 12–14 46.2% — 1,707 0 0 1984 1–9 10.0% — 1,524 0 0
26 1983 5–16 23.8% — 1,567 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Barbara Hallquist Sherry Acker
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1973 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1975 — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1977 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1979 7 6 13 53.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
21 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1980 5 6 11 45.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 17 18 35 48.6%
22 1979 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1981 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3%
23 1980 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1981 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 7 6 13 53.8% 0 5 5 0.0% 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1982 7 5 12 58.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 1984 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1983 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 34 38 72 47.2% 3 12 15 20.0% 22 28 50 44.0% 1 9 10 10.0% — 20 29 49 40.8% 7 13 20 35.0% 14 25 39 35.9% 22 33 55 40.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Barbara Hallquist Sherry Acker
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1973 1516 110.1 — — — — +80 — — 66.7% +2.33 — — — +0.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 1500 97.3 — — — — +94 — — 38.5% -0.85 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +1.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1975 1541 102.9 — — — — — — +36 60.0% +0.60 2–0 1–1 — +0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1976 1530 102.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1977 1578 113.0 — — — — — — — 57.1% +0.21 2–0 1–0 — +0.30 1979 1592 125.7 — — — — +77 -54 -63 40.0% -0.87 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 98.5 +2.58
21 1978 1616 117.7 — — — — +29 — -43 48.6% -0.16 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.13 1980 1833 147.5 — — — — +12 -287 -234 47.8% -0.02 10–8 (56%) 6–6 (50%) 106.3 -3.15
22 1979 1566 114.8 — — — — +87 — -68 27.0% -1.76 3–4 (43%) 0–1 — -0.92 1981 1683 125.7 — — — — +54 -94 -123 33.3% -0.87 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 94.0 -2.47
23 1980 1704 131.6 — — — — -27 -213 -91 52.4% -0.19 4–5 (44%) 6–1 (86%) 104.8 -1.47 1982 1632 123.1 — — — — — — -42 33.3% -0.87 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.18
24 1981 1737 128.5 — — — — -9 — -69 43.2% -0.74 8–4 (67%) 2–0 — -2.02 1983 1620 119.1 — — — — +5 — +38 39.3% -0.70 4–2 (67%) 3–4 (43%) 102.8 +0.08
25 1982 1708 102.3 — — — — -1 -251 -62 44.1% -0.80 5–2 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 102.9 -0.55 1984 1524 98.7 — — — — -5 — — 24.0% -1.40 1–4 (20%) 1–3 (25%) 95.3 +0.60
26 1983 1568 105.1 — — — — +49 -96 +31 28.3% -1.37 1–3 (25%) 0–3 (0%) 93.9 +0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1778 121.7 — — — — +21 -189 -53 43.1% -0.66 30–22 (58%) 16–12 (57%) 106.7 -0.71 — 1844 135.7 — — — — +28 -151 -74 40.4% -0.56 19–26 (42%) 15–23 (39%) 97.2 -1.35

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.