H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Barbara Hallquist vs Trey Lewis H2H: 1-0

Barbara Hallquist holds a 1–0 lead over Trey Lewis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Barbara Hallquist leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbara Hallquist won the 1981 US Open round of 128 6-4 3-6 6-2.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Barbara Hallquist 6-4 3-6 6-2 Trey Lewis Match data Sep 3, 1981* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Barbara Hallquist 1,777 67 90 42.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Trey Lewis 1,536 23 53 30.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbara Hallquist Trey Lewis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1973 2–1 66.7% 1,516 0 0
17 1974 2–3 40.0% 1,500 0 0
18 1975 3–1 75.0% 1,541 0 0 1978 2–2 50.0% 1,503 0 0
19 1976 0–1 0.0% 1,530 0 0 1979 3–4 42.9% 1,521 0 1
20 1977 4–2 66.7% 1,577 0 0 1980 6–14 30.0% 1,516 0 1
21 1978 8–9 47.1% 1,615 0 0 1981 4–10 28.6% 1,521 0 1
22 1979 3–13 18.8% 1,564 0 0 1982 3–10 23.1% 1,482 0 1
23 1980 14–13 51.9% 1,702 0 0 1983 3–7 30.0% 1,477 0 1
24 1981 14–17 45.2% 1,736 0 0 1984 2–5 28.6% 1,447 0 1
25 1982 12–14 46.2% 1,706 0 0 1985 0–1 0.0% 1,442 0 1
26 1983 5–16 23.8% 1,567 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Barbara Hallquist Trey Lewis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1973 2 1 3 66.7%
17 1974 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1975 3 1 4 75.0%
19 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 6 6 0.0%
21 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1981 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1979 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1982 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1980 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1983 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1981 7 6 13 53.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 5 5 0.0% 1984 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1982 7 5 12 58.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1985 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1983 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
Career 34 38 72 47.2% 3 12 15 20.0% 22 28 50 44.0% 1 9 10 10.0% 11 24 35 31.4% 4 10 14 28.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 9 11 18.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Barbara Hallquist Trey Lewis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1973 1516 110.1 +80 66.7% +2.33 +0.83
17 1974 1500 97.3 +94 38.5% -0.85 2–1 (67%) 0–1 +1.26
18 1975 1541 102.9 +36 60.0% +0.60 2–0 1–1 +0.62 1978 1503 104.8 50.0% +0.60 1–1 0–1 +0.13
19 1976 1530 102.4 33.3% -1.00 0–1 +0.08 1979 1521 113.5 +81 +56 47.1% -0.12 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 98.1 +0.87
20 1977 1578 113.0 57.1% +0.21 2–0 1–0 +0.31 1980 1517 113.6 +29 33.3% -0.98 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 97.3 +1.11
21 1978 1615 117.4 +32 -43 48.6% -0.16 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) +0.27 1981 1521 114.4 +64 +7 41.7% -0.78 1–7 (13%) 2–4 (33%) 93.5 -0.13
22 1979 1564 114.4 +88 -66 27.0% -1.76 3–4 (43%) 0–1 -0.88 1982 1482 106.8 +22 +3 37.1% -0.69 2–7 (22%) 0–2 +0.82
23 1980 1702 131.2 -29 -211 -89 52.4% -0.19 4–5 (44%) 6–1 (86%) 104.8 -1.74 1983 1477 100.3 +11 +60 39.1% -0.57 0–3 (0%) 0–4 (0%) 92.1 +0.75
24 1981 1736 128.2 -10 -69 43.2% -0.74 8–4 (67%) 2–0 -2.03 1984 1448 90.5 -2 29.4% -1.06 2–1 (67%) 0–2 +1.08
25 1982 1707 102.0 -3 -250 -62 44.1% -0.80 5–2 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 102.8 -0.61 1985 1442 100.3 33.3% -1.33 0–1 -0.03
26 1983 1567 105.0 +48 -95 +32 28.3% -1.37 1–3 (25%) 0–3 (0%) 93.9 +0.68
Career 1777 121.4 +20 -188 -52 43.1% -0.66 30–22 (58%) 16–12 (57%) 106.6 -0.77 1536 111.0 +32 +17 +60 38.2% -0.69 9–25 (26%) 6–20 (23%) 82.9 +6.05

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.