H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Barbara Hawcroft vs Chris Oneil H2H: 1-0

Barbara Hawcroft holds a 1–0 lead over Chris Oneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Barbara Hawcroft leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Barbara Hawcroft won the 1972 Hobart 2 round of 16 6-3 6-0.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
AUS Age 70 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Barbara Hawcroft 6-3 6-0 Chris Oneil Match data Dec 22, 1972* R16 Hobart 2 WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Barbara Hawcroft 1,728 63 53 54.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Chris Oneil 1,766 99 108 47.8% 1 0 0 2 6 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbara Hawcroft Chris Oneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1972 6–3 66.7% 1,547 0 2
17 1968 2–2 50.0% 1,502 0 0 1973 0–3 0.0% 1,502 0 2
18 1969 3–7 30.0% 1,482 0 0 1974 10–12 45.5% 1,588 0 2
19 1975 30–17 63.8% 1,661 0 4
20 1971 28–21 57.1% 1,634 0 1 1976 14–6 70.0% 1,691 0 7
21 1972 29–21 58.0% 1,688 0 1 1977 2–5 28.6% 1,638 0 7
22 1973 1–1 50.0% 1,680 0 1 1978 13–12 52.0% 1,716 1 8
23 1974 0–1 0.0% 1,656 0 1 1979 7–12 36.8% 1,630 1 8
24 1980 5–8 38.5% 1,575 1 8
25 1981 4–9 30.8% 1,552 1 9
26 1982 3–6 33.3% 1,595 1 9
27 1983 5–15 25.0% 1,526 1 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Barbara Hawcroft Chris Oneil
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1972 3 0 3 100.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
17 1968 2 2 4 50.0% 1973 0 3 3 0.0%
18 1969 2 2 4 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1974 4 4 8 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
19 1975 18 5 23 78.3% 10 8 18 55.6%
20 1971 2 2 4 50.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 16 13 29 55.2% 1976 3 3 6 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
21 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 23 12 35 65.7% 1977 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 1973 1 1 2 50.0% 1978 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1974 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
24 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1981 0 5 5 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
26 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1983 2 6 8 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
Career 3 3 6 50.0% 17 14 31 54.8% 43 34 77 55.8% 4 11 15 26.7% 33 37 70 47.1% 46 48 94 48.9% 0 3 3 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Barbara Hawcroft Chris Oneil
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1972 1548 107.2 +39 +1 57.9% +0.53 2–1 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 104.5 +1.29
17 1968 1502 102.4 +25 50.0% +0.25 +0.21 1973 1503 96.5 -14 14.3% -2.00 0–1 0–2 +0.32
18 1969 1482 99.0 +31 +3 25.0% -1.80 1–1 +0.42 1974 1589 130.7 +28 -30 49.0% -0.18 2–5 (29%) 1–1 -0.21
19 1975 1661 134.9 +126 -23 61.8% +0.86 5–3 (63%) 7–1 (88%) 106.5 +3.59
20 1971 1635 130.2 -55 +21 +9 54.9% +0.66 9–6 (60%) 1–2 (33%) 102.5 +2.60 1976 1691 124.2 +57 -6 68.2% +1.39 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.3 +2.35
21 1972 1689 126.2 -69 +77 58.2% +0.46 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 97.9 +3.49 1977 1638 111.9 +4 35.3% -0.53 1–2 (33%) 1–0 +0.42
22 1973 1681 99.8 40.0% -1.20 1–0 +0.78 1978 1716 126.6 -151 -47 +65 49.1% 0.00 4–3 (57%) 1–1 +1.21
23 1974 1657 98.0 33.3% -2.00 0–1 +0.32 1979 1631 118.0 -44 -33 +83 43.2% -0.55 3–5 (38%) 1–0 +1.29
24 1980 1576 99.2 -18 +119 37.9% -0.79 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) 98.2 +0.16
25 1981 1552 111.1 -52 +127 39.3% -1.11 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) +0.74
26 1982 1596 132.3 -112 +127 38.1% -0.76 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 100.0 -1.11
27 1983 1527 99.9 -38 -41 +147 27.3% -1.34 2–2 (50%) 0–5 (0%) 95.9 +0.78
Career 1729 125.0 -55 -13 +42 53.3% +0.31 15–14 (52%) 4–3 (57%) 100.3 +6.74 1766 128.0 -62 +33 +36 48.6% -0.06 25–30 (45%) 19–17 (53%) 100.0 +5.26

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.