H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Barbara Hawcroft vs Nancy Richey H2H: 0-1

Nancy Richey holds a 1–0 lead over Barbara Hawcroft in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nancy Richey leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nancy Richey won the 1972 Charlotte round of 32 6-0 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Barbara Hawcroft
AUS Age 75
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Nancy Richey
USA Age 84 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nancy Richey 6-0 6-2 Barbara Hawcroft Match data Sep 15, 1972* R32 Charlotte WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Barbara Hawcroft — — — 1,728 63 53 54.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Nancy Richey — #8 — 2,245 324 109 74.8% 1 0 0 2 19 22

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbara Hawcroft Nancy Richey
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1968 2–2 50.0% — 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1969 3–7 30.0% — 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1971 28–21 57.1% — 1,634 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1972 29–21 58.0% — 1,688 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 1973 1–1 50.0% — 1,680 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 1974 0–1 0.0% — 1,656 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 — — — — — — — 1968 56–5 91.8% — 1,916 1 4
26 — — — — — — — 1969 33–8 80.5% — 2,054 1 7
27 — — — — — — — 1970 43–8 84.3% — 2,122 1 14
28 — — — — — — — 1971 29–13 69.0% — 2,076 1 14
29 — — — — — — — 1972 45–12 78.9% — 2,194 1 19
30 — — — — — — — 1973 34–13 72.3% — 2,191 1 19
31 — — — — — — — 1974 25–13 65.8% — 2,151 1 19
32 — — — — — — — 1975 24–11 68.6% #8 2,120 1 20
33 — — — — — — — 1976 14–10 58.3% — 2,084 1 20
34 — — — — — — — 1977 15–7 68.2% — 2,016 1 22
35 — — — — — — — 1978 6–9 40.0% — 1,922 1 22

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Barbara Hawcroft Nancy Richey
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1968 1502 102.4 — — — — — — +25 50.0% +0.25 — — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1969 1482 99.0 — — — — — +31 +3 25.0% -1.80 1–1 — — +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1971 1635 130.2 — — — — -55 +21 +9 54.9% +0.66 9–6 (60%) 1–2 (33%) 102.5 +2.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1972 1689 126.2 — — — — — -69 +77 58.2% +0.46 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 97.9 +3.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1973 1681 99.8 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.20 1–0 — — +0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1974 1657 98.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1916 145.6 — — — — -119 +83 -174 87.6% +3.09 10–1 (91%) — — -0.10
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 2054 151.8 — — — — +32 -32 -127 77.3% +1.99 6–2 (75%) — — -3.41
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 2123 162.9 — — — — +60 -35 -127 80.0% +2.51 6–2 (75%) 1–0 — -4.02
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 2077 156.0 — — — — +22 +31 -94 65.1% +1.50 4–4 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 97.6 -3.59
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 2194 166.6 — — — — +186 -41 -224 79.6% +2.43 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 101.6 -6.67
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 2192 164.0 — — — — +123 -6 -220 67.6% +1.24 9–7 (56%) 7–3 (70%) 101.3 -7.33
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 2152 156.5 — — — — +112 +19 -165 68.9% +1.60 7–3 (70%) 3–3 (50%) 99.8 -3.90
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 2121 155.3 — — — — +105 -19 — 65.8% +1.55 8–4 (67%) 2–6 (25%) 96.2 -2.17
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 2085 155.1 — — — — +132 -40 — 60.0% +0.82 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 96.6 -4.18
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 2016 146.8 — — — — +91 +43 — 64.6% +1.42 3–3 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 96.9 -1.27
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1923 136.5 — — — — +56 +55 — 45.5% -0.24 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 95.2 -2.03
Career — 1729 125.0 — — — — -55 -13 +42 53.3% +0.31 15–14 (52%) 4–3 (57%) 100.3 +6.74 — 2245 164.5 — — — — +89 +9 -154 72.7% +1.89 62–37 (63%) 26–26 (50%) 100.3 -9.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.