H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Barbara Hawcroft vs Trish Mcclenaughan H2H: 1-0

Barbara Hawcroft holds a 1–0 lead over Trish Mcclenaughan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Barbara Hawcroft leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Barbara Hawcroft won the 1971 Nottingham Open quarterfinal 6-0 6-3.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Barbara Hawcroft 6-0 6-3 Trish Mcclenaughan Match data Jun 12, 1971* QF Nottingham Open WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Barbara Hawcroft 1,728 63 53 54.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Trish Mcclenaughan 1,539 6 15 28.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbara Hawcroft Trish Mcclenaughan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1968 2–2 50.0% 1,502 0 0
18 1969 3–7 30.0% 1,482 0 0
20 1971 28–21 57.1% 1,634 0 1
21 1972 29–21 58.0% 1,688 0 1
22 1973 1–1 50.0% 1,680 0 1
23 1974 0–1 0.0% 1,656 0 1
24 1970 2–2 50.0% 1,519 0 0
25 1971 3–6 33.3% 1,502 0 0
26 1972 0–4 0.0% 1,464 0 0
28 1974 1–2 33.3% 1,487 0 0
30 1976 0–1 0.0% 1,485 0 0

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Barbara Hawcroft Trish Mcclenaughan
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1968 1502 102.4 +25 50.0% +0.25 +0.21
18 1969 1482 99.0 +31 +3 25.0% -1.80 1–1 +0.42
20 1971 1635 130.2 -55 +21 +9 54.9% +0.66 9–6 (60%) 1–2 (33%) 102.5 +2.60
21 1972 1689 126.2 -69 +77 58.2% +0.46 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 97.9 +3.49
22 1973 1681 99.8 40.0% -1.20 1–0 +0.78
23 1974 1657 98.0 33.3% -2.00 0–1 +0.32
24 1970 1519 108.3 +75 50.0% -0.50 1–1 +0.42
25 1971 1503 96.3 +63 38.1% -0.76 1–2 (33%) +0.81
26 1972 1464 93.8 +32 11.1% -3.11 0–1 -0.11
28 1974 1487 113.3 37.5% -1.75 1–1 -0.17
30 1976 1486 106.3 0.0% -3.00 -0.09
Career 1729 125.0 -55 -13 +42 53.3% +0.31 15–14 (52%) 4–3 (57%) 100.3 +6.74 1540 104.9 +57 34.0% -1.38 3–5 (38%) +4.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.