H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Barbara Hawcroft vs Virginia Wade H2H: 0-3
Virginia Wade holds a 3–0 lead over Barbara Hawcroft in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Virginia Wade leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Virginia Wade won the 1972 Toronto fourth round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 75
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 81
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 1972 | Toronto | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Virginia Wade | 6-2 6-4 | Barbara Hawcroft | Match data |
| Jan 9, 1972* | Sydney | WTA 500 | SF | Grass | Virginia Wade | 6-3 6-2 | Barbara Hawcroft | Match data |
| Jun 16, 1971* | Queen's Club | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Virginia Wade | 8-6 6-4 | Barbara Hawcroft | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Hawcroft | — | — | — | 1,727 | 63 | 53 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Virginia Wade | #138 | #40 | — | 2,313 | 865 | 314 | 73.4% | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 51 | 58 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Hawcroft | Virginia Wade | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1968 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1969 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1971 | 28–21 | 57.1% | — | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1972 | 29–21 | 58.0% | — | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 85–19 | 81.7% | — | 1,945 | 1 | 9 |
| 23 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 82–18 | 82.0% | — | 2,118 | 1 | 16 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 69–22 | 75.8% | — | 2,080 | 1 | 21 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 64–16 | 80.0% | — | 2,161 | 1 | 29 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 75–23 | 76.5% | — | 2,151 | 2 | 34 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 63–16 | 79.7% | — | 2,158 | 2 | 40 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 60–16 | 78.9% | — | 2,189 | 2 | 45 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 65–14 | 82.3% | — | 2,313 | 2 | 51 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 48–17 | 73.8% | — | 2,256 | 2 | 53 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 50–18 | 73.5% | — | 2,274 | 3 | 55 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 69–25 | 73.4% | — | 2,240 | 3 | 58 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 51–26 | 66.2% | — | 2,088 | 3 | 58 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 30–21 | 58.8% | — | 1,885 | 3 | 58 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 25–21 | 54.3% | — | 1,824 | 3 | 58 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,749 | 3 | 58 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 10–9 | 52.6% | — | 1,788 | 3 | 58 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #61 | 1,728 | 3 | 58 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,712 | 3 | 58 |