H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Barbara Paulus vs Elena Pampoulova H2H: 2-0
Barbara Paulus holds a 2–0 lead over Elena Pampoulova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Barbara Paulus leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbara Paulus won the 1997 Key Biscayne second round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 55
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
BUL
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 1997* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Barbara Paulus | 6-1 6-3 | Elena Pampoulova | Match data |
| Aug 29, 1996* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Barbara Paulus | 7-5 7-6 | Elena Pampoulova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Paulus | #347 | #10 | 1,696 | 1,956 | 229 | 138 | 62.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Elena Pampoulova | — | — | — | 1,658 | 58 | 96 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Paulus | Elena Pampoulova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1986 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #165 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1987 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 19–10 | 65.5% | #27 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #24 | 1,831 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #15 | 1,894 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #25 | 1,868 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #209 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1994 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #108 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 0–10 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 21–7 | 75.0% | #23 | 1,802 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #13 | 1,876 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #24 | 1,860 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1998 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #45 | 1,745 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 1 |