H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Barbara Paulus vs Emanuela Zardo H2H: 3-0

Barbara Paulus holds a 3–0 lead over Emanuela Zardo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Barbara Paulus leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbara Paulus won the 1995 Australian Open round of 128 7-6(3) 6-0.

AUT Age 56 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 0
3 main-draw meetings
SUI Age 56 Left-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Barbara Paulus #110 7-6(3) 6-0 Emanuela Zardo #87 Match data Jan 18, 1995* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Barbara Paulus #20 6-3 6-4 Emanuela Zardo #93 Match data Jul 14, 1990* QF Palermo Tier V modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Barbara Paulus #16 7-5 6-3 Emanuela Zardo #132 Match data May 26, 1990* SF Geneva Tier IV modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Barbara Paulus #347 #10 1,696 1,957 232 140 62.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Emanuela Zardo #976 #27 80 1,756 69 75 47.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbara Paulus Emanuela Zardo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1986 4–3 57.1% #165 1,528 0 0
16 1987 11–10 52.4% #70 1,594 0 0
17 1988 21–11 65.6% #27 1,755 0 1 1987 0–1 0.0% #258 1,488 0 0
18 1989 30–16 65.2% #24 1,835 0 1 1988 0–1 0.0% #283 1,476 0 0
19 1990 32–14 69.6% #15 1,895 0 2 1989 0–3 0.0% #142 1,449 0 0
20 1991 17–13 56.7% #25 1,846 0 2 1990 13–12 52.0% #63 1,593 0 0
21 1992 4–8 33.3% #209 1,719 0 2 1991 17–11 60.7% #31 1,714 0 1
22 1992 18–15 54.5% #39 1,740 0 1
23 1994 5–7 41.7% #108 1,659 0 2 1993 12–16 42.9% #73 1,650 0 1
24 1995 21–7 75.0% #23 1,798 0 4 1994 9–13 40.9% #89 1,574 0 1
25 1996 38–16 70.4% #10 1,868 0 5 1995 0–3 0.0% #181 1,542 0 1
26 1997 32–16 66.7% #24 1,878 0 6
27 1998 17–19 47.2% #45 1,751 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Barbara Paulus Emanuela Zardo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1986 4 3 7 57.1%
16 1987 11 8 19 57.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1988 6 2 8 75.0% 14 7 21 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1987 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1989 11 6 17 64.7% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1990 16 7 23 69.6% 9 1 10 90.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1991 9 9 18 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1990 3 4 7 42.9% 9 7 16 56.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1992 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1991 1 4 5 20.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1992 2 4 6 33.3% 15 9 24 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1994 5 7 12 41.7% 1993 3 5 8 37.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 1995 9 2 11 81.8% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1994 6 5 11 54.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1996 8 5 13 61.5% 22 6 28 78.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 1995 0 3 3 0.0%
26 1997 5 4 9 55.6% 18 7 25 72.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7%
27 1998 5 8 13 38.5% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
Career 75 55 130 57.7% 120 56 176 68.2% 2 6 8 25.0% 35 23 58 60.3% 15 25 40 37.5% 49 38 87 56.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 9 13 30.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Barbara Paulus Emanuela Zardo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1986 1529 102.3 +50 52.9% -0.47 2–1 (67%) 2–0 +0.85
16 1987 1594 117.4 +61 52.2% -0.02 2–4 (33%) 1–0 +2.31
17 1988 1756 133.5 -127 +35 61.1% +0.69 6–2 (75%) 5–2 (71%) 107.4 +1.41 1987 1488 96.8 0.0% -4.50 -0.01
18 1989 1835 142.7 -98 +11 58.0% +0.71 15–5 (75%) 1–5 (17%) 103.7 -1.53 1988 1477 101.6 33.3% -1.00 0–1 +0.05
19 1990 1896 143.9 -23 +25 63.7% +0.76 13–8 (62%) 5–3 (63%) 103.5 +1.16 1989 1450 99.4 14.3% -2.86 0–1 +0.13
20 1991 1846 140.0 0 53.8% +0.29 6–3 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 101.6 -1.04 1990 1594 122.2 -34 -2 50.9% +0.26 4–3 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 102.9 +0.71
21 1992 1720 104.4 +20 +127 37.0% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +0.05 1991 1714 136.8 -190 +100 58.1% +0.87 4–2 (67%) 0–3 (0%) 101.3 +0.08
22 1992 1741 131.9 -208 +113 51.4% -0.15 6–2 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 106.9 -0.32
23 1994 1660 112.9 +3 31.8% -0.82 1–1 1–3 (25%) -0.39 1993 1651 114.5 -126 +136 41.9% -0.50 4–2 (67%) 5–3 (63%) 104.1 +0.44
24 1995 1799 130.3 -17 +64 67.2% +1.11 7–1 (88%) 4–0 (100%) 110.4 +2.57 1994 1575 109.2 -11 +87 41.7% -0.46 2–2 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 97.3 +1.56
25 1996 1869 151.5 -65 +97 67.2% +1.23 9–12 (43%) 3–3 (50%) 94.9 +0.39 1995 1542 100.6 -20 0.0% -2.83 0–1 -0.22
26 1997 1878 149.1 -57 +105 64.8% +1.27 9–6 (60%) 4–4 (50%) 100.4 +3.06
27 1998 1751 136.5 +25 +129 46.3% -0.34 7–5 (58%) 2–1 (67%) 100.4 -0.80
Career 1958 145.3 -35 +69 58.7% +0.60 78–50 (61%) 34–26 (57%) 105.4 +2.18 1756 126.9 -99 +89 47.0% -0.14 20–13 (61%) 14–17 (45%) 105.2 +1.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.