H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Barbara Paulus vs Isabel Cueto H2H: 0-3

Isabel Cueto holds a 3–0 lead over Barbara Paulus in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Isabel Cueto leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Isabel Cueto won the 1990 Palermo final 6-2 6-2.

AUT Age 56 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 3
3 main-draw meetings
GER Age 57 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Isabel Cueto #23 6-2 6-2 Barbara Paulus #20 Match data Jul 15, 1990* F Palermo Tier V modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Isabel Cueto #27 6-2 6-1 Barbara Paulus #38 Match data Aug 6, 1988* SF Athens WTA 250 Clay
Isabel Cueto #32 6-2 3-6 6-1 Barbara Paulus #96 Match data Dec 5, 1987* SF Buenos Aires WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Barbara Paulus #347 #10 1,696 1,957 232 140 62.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Isabel Cueto #256 #20 45 1,885 130 101 56.3% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbara Paulus Isabel Cueto
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1986 4–3 57.1% #165 1,528 0 0 1984 1–2 33.3% #168 1,509 0 0
16 1987 11–10 52.4% #70 1,594 0 0 1985 6–9 40.0% #165 1,520 0 0
17 1988 21–11 65.6% #27 1,755 0 1 1986 12–16 42.9% #101 1,538 0 0
18 1989 30–16 65.2% #24 1,835 0 1 1987 30–17 63.8% #29 1,761 0 0
19 1990 32–14 69.6% #15 1,895 0 2 1988 27–15 64.3% #31 1,825 0 2
20 1991 17–13 56.7% #25 1,846 0 2 1989 24–12 66.7% #28 1,816 0 4
21 1992 4–8 33.3% #209 1,719 0 2 1990 23–14 62.2% #26 1,799 0 5
22 1991 7–11 38.9% #117 1,662 0 5
23 1994 5–7 41.7% #108 1,659 0 2 1992 0–5 0.0% #283 1,590 0 5
24 1995 21–7 75.0% #23 1,798 0 4
25 1996 38–16 70.4% #10 1,868 0 5
26 1997 32–16 66.7% #24 1,878 0 6
27 1998 17–19 47.2% #45 1,751 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Barbara Paulus Isabel Cueto
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1986 4 3 7 57.1% 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
16 1987 11 8 19 57.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1988 6 2 8 75.0% 14 7 21 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1989 11 6 17 64.7% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 5 4 9 55.6% 25 12 37 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1990 16 7 23 69.6% 9 1 10 90.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 1988 2 2 4 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1991 9 9 18 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1989 1 1 2 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6%
21 1992 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 22 11 33 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 6 9 15 40.0%
23 1994 5 7 12 41.7% 1992 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1995 9 2 11 81.8% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 1996 8 5 13 61.5% 22 6 28 78.6% 8 5 13 61.5%
26 1997 5 4 9 55.6% 18 7 25 72.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7%
27 1998 5 8 13 38.5% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
Career 75 55 130 57.7% 120 56 176 68.2% 2 6 8 25.0% 35 23 58 60.3% 12 21 33 36.4% 116 72 188 61.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Barbara Paulus Isabel Cueto
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1986 1529 102.3 +50 52.9% -0.47 2–1 (67%) 2–0 +0.85 1984 1509 106.2 42.9% -1.14 0–1 1–0 -0.12
16 1987 1594 117.4 +61 52.2% -0.02 2–4 (33%) 1–0 +2.31 1985 1521 110.4 +17 +59 44.4% -0.39 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 97.3 +1.55
17 1988 1756 133.5 -127 +35 61.1% +0.69 6–2 (75%) 5–2 (71%) 107.4 +1.41 1986 1539 121.5 -48 +97 43.8% -0.06 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 99.0 +2.15
18 1989 1835 142.7 -98 +11 58.0% +0.71 15–5 (75%) 1–5 (17%) 103.7 -1.53 1987 1761 135.7 -187 +64 57.5% +0.56 11–1 (92%) 3–5 (38%) 110.5 +3.28
19 1990 1896 143.9 -23 +25 63.7% +0.76 13–8 (62%) 5–3 (63%) 103.5 +1.16 1988 1826 141.4 -254 +103 62.0% +1.03 5–3 (63%) 2–5 (29%) 99.0 +0.40
20 1991 1846 140.0 0 53.8% +0.29 6–3 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 101.6 -1.04 1989 1817 132.8 +87 64.6% +1.01 6–3 (67%) 5–6 (45%) 98.8 +1.58
21 1992 1720 104.4 +20 +127 37.0% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +0.05 1990 1799 139.4 -220 +80 60.2% +0.75 5–4 (56%) 5–4 (56%) 97.0 -0.94
22 1991 1662 120.0 -82 +47 45.2% -0.19 3–5 (38%) 0–4 (0%) 91.6 +0.03
23 1994 1660 112.9 +3 31.8% -0.82 1–1 1–3 (25%) -0.39 1992 1591 97.8 -65 0.0% -3.67 -0.24
24 1995 1799 130.3 -17 +64 67.2% +1.11 7–1 (88%) 4–0 (100%) 110.4 +2.57
25 1996 1869 151.5 -65 +97 67.2% +1.23 9–12 (43%) 3–3 (50%) 94.9 +0.39
26 1997 1878 149.1 -57 +105 64.8% +1.27 9–6 (60%) 4–4 (50%) 100.4 +3.06
27 1998 1751 136.5 +25 +129 46.3% -0.34 7–5 (58%) 2–1 (67%) 100.4 -0.80
Career 1958 145.3 -35 +69 58.7% +0.60 78–50 (61%) 34–26 (57%) 105.4 +2.18 1885 137.0 -131 +81 55.3% +0.47 36–25 (59%) 20–30 (40%) 95.9 +3.33

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.