H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Barbara Paulus vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 3-1

Barbara Paulus holds a 3–1 lead over Sandra Cecchini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Barbara Paulus leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Barbara Paulus won the 1997 Palermo fourth round 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Barbara Paulus
AUT Age 55 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 18, 1997* Palermo WTA 250 R16 Clay Barbara Paulus #16 6-1 6-4 Sandra Cecchini #146 Match data
Aug 11, 1996* Maria Lankowitz WTA 250 F Clay Barbara Paulus #16 0-0 (ret.) Sandra Cecchini #98 Match data
May 31, 1989* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Barbara Paulus #34 1-6 6-4 6-4 Sandra Cecchini #25 Match data
Jul 16, 1988* Nice WTA 250 QF Clay Sandra Cecchini #18 6-3 2-6 6-1 Barbara Paulus #37 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Barbara Paulus #347 #10 1,696 1,956 229 138 62.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,937 299 215 58.2% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbara Paulus Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1986 4–3 57.1% #165 1,528 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1987 11–10 52.4% #70 1,594 0 0 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1988 19–10 65.5% #27 1,730 0 1 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,485 0 0
18 1989 30–16 65.2% #24 1,831 0 1 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,497 0 0
19 1990 32–14 69.6% #15 1,894 0 2 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1991 17–13 56.7% #25 1,868 0 2 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1992 3–7 30.0% #209 1,734 0 2 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,635 0 3
22 — — — — — — — 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,860 0 5
23 1994 5–7 41.7% #108 1,668 0 2 1988 34–14 70.8% #21 1,845 0 7
24 1995 21–7 75.0% #23 1,802 0 4 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1996 38–16 70.4% #13 1,876 0 5 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,815 0 9
26 1997 32–16 66.7% #24 1,860 0 6 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,776 0 10
27 1998 17–19 47.2% #45 1,745 0 6 1992 23–15 60.5% #34 1,824 0 11
28 — — — — — — — 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,725 0 11
29 — — — — — — — 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,629 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,610 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,556 0 11