H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Barbara Potter vs Andrea Leand H2H: 1-1
Barbara Potter and Andrea Leand are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrea Leand leads 1–0 on carpet, while Barbara Potter leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrea Leand won the 1984 East Hanover third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 64
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 1984* | East Hanover | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Andrea Leand | 6-3 6-3 | Barbara Potter | Match data |
| Sep 9, 1981* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Barbara Potter | 6-7 7-6 6-3 | Andrea Leand | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Potter | #112 | #10 | 63 | 2,096 | 299 | 190 | 61.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| Andrea Leand | #857 | #27 | 13 | 1,883 | 83 | 104 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Potter | Andrea Leand | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1978 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1979 | 8–22 | 26.7% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1980 | 23–21 | 52.3% | — | 1,861 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 29–22 | 56.9% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1981 | 47–23 | 67.1% | — | 1,943 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 43–22 | 66.2% | — | 1,993 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #35 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1983 | 28–20 | 58.3% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #33 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1984 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,951 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1985 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #15 | 1,899 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1986 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #26 | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1987 | 25–13 | 65.8% | #12 | 1,894 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #152 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1988 | 36–14 | 72.0% | #10 | 1,918 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #142 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1989 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,845 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #180 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #341 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #461 | 1,473 | 0 | 1 |