H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Barbara Potter vs Andrea Temesvari H2H: 3-1
Barbara Potter holds a 3–1 lead over Andrea Temesvari in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Barbara Potter leads 1–0 on carpet, while Andrea Temesvari leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Barbara Potter won the 1984 Australian Open fourth round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 64
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 60
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 1984* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Barbara Potter | 6-4 7-5 | Andrea Temesvari | Match data |
| Feb 28, 1984 | Virginia Slims Championships | WTA Finals | R16 | Carpet | Barbara Potter | 6-3 6-7 2-1 (ret.) | Andrea Temesvari | Match data |
| Apr 8, 1983* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Andrea Temesvari | 6-0 6-4 | Barbara Potter | Match data |
| Aug 26, 1982* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Barbara Potter | 6-4 7-5 | Andrea Temesvari | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Potter | #112 | #10 | 63 | 2,096 | 299 | 190 | 61.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| Andrea Temesvari | #932 | #7 | 109 | 2,021 | 185 | 178 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Potter | Andrea Temesvari | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 11–6 | 64.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1978 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 18–14 | 56.2% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1979 | 8–22 | 26.7% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 42–15 | 73.7% | — | 1,988 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1980 | 23–21 | 52.3% | — | 1,861 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #14 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1981 | 47–23 | 67.1% | — | 1,943 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1982 | 43–22 | 66.2% | — | 1,993 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1983 | 28–20 | 58.3% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #193 | 1,762 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1984 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,951 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1985 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #15 | 1,899 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #43 | 1,752 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1986 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #26 | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1987 | 25–13 | 65.8% | #12 | 1,894 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #159 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1988 | 36–14 | 72.0% | #10 | 1,918 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,616 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1989 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,845 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #153 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #133 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,487 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #181 | 1,537 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #940 | 1,533 | 0 | 5 |