H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Barbara Potter vs Catherine Tanvier H2H: 1-1
Barbara Potter and Catherine Tanvier are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Catherine Tanvier won the 1984 Brighton fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 64
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 61
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 1984* | Brighton | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Catherine Tanvier | 6-3 6-3 | Barbara Potter | Match data |
| Feb 26, 1981* | Seattle | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Barbara Potter | 6-3 6-3 | Catherine Tanvier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Potter | #112 | #10 | 63 | 2,096 | 299 | 190 | 61.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| Catherine Tanvier | #752 | #20 | 22 | 1,877 | 161 | 179 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Potter | Catherine Tanvier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1978 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1979 | 8–22 | 26.7% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 23–19 | 54.8% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1980 | 23–21 | 52.3% | — | 1,861 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,824 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1981 | 47–23 | 67.1% | — | 1,943 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 43–22 | 66.2% | — | 1,993 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #39 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 28–20 | 58.3% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #37 | 1,825 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,951 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #96 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1985 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #15 | 1,899 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #77 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1986 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #26 | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1987 | 25–13 | 65.8% | #12 | 1,894 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #99 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1988 | 36–14 | 72.0% | #10 | 1,918 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #104 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1989 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,845 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #105 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #543 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |