H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Barbara Potter vs Eva Pfaff H2H: 2-2
Barbara Potter and Eva Pfaff are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Barbara Potter leads 2–1 on carpet, while Eva Pfaff leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Eva Pfaff won the 1989 Washington third round 6-3 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 64
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
GER
Age 65
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 1989 | Washington | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Eva Pfaff | 6-3 3-6 6-2 | Barbara Potter | Match data |
| Feb 4, 1984* | Houston | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Barbara Potter | 7-6 6-3 | Eva Pfaff | Match data |
| Jan 2, 1984 | Washington | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Barbara Potter | 6-2 6-1 | Eva Pfaff | Match data |
| Jan 13, 1983* | Houston | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Eva Pfaff | 1-6 7-5 6-2 | Barbara Potter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Potter | #112 | #10 | 63 | 2,096 | 299 | 190 | 61.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| Eva Pfaff | #420 | #17 | 21 | 1,902 | 155 | 202 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Potter | Eva Pfaff | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1978 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1979 | 8–22 | 26.7% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1980 | 23–21 | 52.3% | — | 1,861 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1981 | 47–23 | 67.1% | — | 1,943 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 43–22 | 66.2% | — | 1,993 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 28–20 | 58.3% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 18–22 | 45.0% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,951 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 31–21 | 59.6% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1985 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #15 | 1,899 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1986 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #26 | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1987 | 25–13 | 65.8% | #12 | 1,894 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #58 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1988 | 36–14 | 72.0% | #10 | 1,918 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1989 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,845 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #74 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #104 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #203 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |