H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Barbara Potter vs Iva Budarova H2H: 4-1
Barbara Potter holds a 4–1 lead over Iva Budarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Barbara Potter leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Barbara Potter won the 1987 Toronto second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 64
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4
–
1
5 main draw meetings
TCH
Age 65
Left-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 1987 | Toronto | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Barbara Potter | 6-3 6-2 | Iva Budarova | Match data |
| Feb 6, 1985* | Delray Beach | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Barbara Potter | 7-6 6-1 | Iva Budarova | Match data |
| Aug 27, 1983* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Barbara Potter | 6-3 6-7 6-1 | Iva Budarova | Match data |
| Aug 27, 1982* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Iva Budarova | 6-4 6-7 6-2 | Barbara Potter | Match data |
| Nov 13, 1980* | Amsterdam | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Barbara Potter | 6-4 6-0 | Iva Budarova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Potter | #112 | #10 | 63 | 2,096 | 299 | 190 | 61.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| Iva Budarova | #661 | #25 | 9 | 1,859 | 148 | 206 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Potter | Iva Budarova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1978 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1979 | 8–22 | 26.7% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1980 | 23–21 | 52.3% | — | 1,861 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1981 | 47–23 | 67.1% | — | 1,943 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1982 | 43–22 | 66.2% | — | 1,993 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1983 | 28–20 | 58.3% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1984 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,951 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 33–23 | 58.9% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1985 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #15 | 1,899 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1986 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #26 | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #68 | 1,727 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1987 | 25–13 | 65.8% | #12 | 1,894 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #112 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1988 | 36–14 | 72.0% | #10 | 1,918 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1989 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,845 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #105 | 1,586 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #186 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 |