H2H data updated: 2026-10-22 00:00 UTC

Barbara Potter vs Kim Jones H2H: 2-1

Barbara Potter holds a 2–1 lead over Kim Jones in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Barbara Potter leads 2–1 on carpet. Most recently, Barbara Potter won the 1984 Tokyo Pan Pacific round of 32 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Barbara Potter
USA Age 65 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Kim Jones
USA Age 69

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Barbara Potter #11 6-1 6-1 Kim Jones Match data Dec 13, 1984* R32 Tokyo Pan Pacific WTA 250 Carpet
Kim Jones 6-3 4-6 6-3 Barbara Potter #12 Match data Mar 23, 1984* R16 Dallas WTA 250 Carpet
Barbara Potter 7-5 6-1 Kim Jones Match data Oct 1, 1982* R16 Philadelphia WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Barbara Potter #112 #8 63 2,098 303 191 61.3% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Kim Jones — — — 1,801 60 103 36.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbara Potter Kim Jones
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1978 4–7 36.4% — 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1979 8–22 26.7% — 1,620 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1980 27–22 55.1% — 1,875 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1981 47–23 67.1% #10 1,944 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1982 43–22 66.2% #8 1,998 0 2 1978 1–1 50.0% — 1,506 0 0
21 1983 28–20 58.3% — 1,851 0 2 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
22 1984 35–17 67.3% #12 1,952 0 2 1980 1–10 9.1% — 1,423 0 0
23 1985 31–16 66.0% #15 1,900 0 3 1981 6–13 31.6% — 1,459 0 0
24 1986 14–10 58.3% #26 1,881 0 3 1982 4–14 22.2% — 1,483 0 0
25 1987 25–13 65.8% #12 1,899 0 4 1983 20–14 58.8% — 1,758 0 1
26 1988 36–14 72.0% #10 1,919 0 5 1984 13–24 35.1% — 1,667 0 1
27 1989 5–5 50.0% #106 1,845 0 5 1985 13–18 41.9% — 1,725 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 1986 2–4 33.3% — 1,677 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1987 0–4 0.0% — 1,629 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Barbara Potter Kim Jones
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1978 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1979 4 8 12 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1980 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 19 14 33 57.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1981 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 12 6 18 66.7% 27 14 41 65.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1982 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 28 10 38 73.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1983 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1984 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 11 4 15 73.3% 17 9 26 65.4% 1980 0 6 6 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1985 12 4 16 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
24 1986 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1982 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
25 1987 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 17 7 24 70.8% 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 4 13 69.2%
26 1988 25 9 34 73.5% — — — — 9 3 12 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1984 4 6 10 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 7 9 22.2% 5 7 12 41.7%
27 1989 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1985 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
Career — 89 54 143 62.2% 5 8 13 38.5% 68 39 107 63.6% 141 90 231 61.0% — 17 35 52 32.7% 6 15 21 28.6% 13 17 30 43.3% 23 34 57 40.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Barbara Potter Kim Jones
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1978 1533 114.1 — — — — +58 — +55 35.7% -1.14 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +1.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1979 1621 143.2 — — — — +30 -115 -41 30.3% -0.89 4–6 (40%) 1–8 (11%) 95.5 -1.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1980 1876 153.1 — — — — +17 — -301 56.8% +0.53 4–11 (27%) 5–6 (45%) 94.6 +0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1981 1944 150.6 — — — — -2 — -145 63.1% +0.79 12–7 (63%) 9–10 (47%) 101.6 -1.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1982 1999 162.9 — — — — +57 — -127 63.3% +0.89 10–7 (59%) 12–14 (46%) 102.4 -2.52 1978 1506 102.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 — — — -0.08
21 1983 1852 139.4 — — — — +53 -246 +13 58.6% +0.77 6–9 (40%) 8–8 (50%) 93.0 +1.63 1979 1490 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.09
22 1984 1953 157.7 — — — — -8 — -15 67.0% +1.24 3–7 (30%) 8–4 (67%) 94.3 -1.58 1980 1423 94.6 — — — — +38 — — 27.6% -1.83 1–6 (14%) 1–2 (33%) 93.2 +0.48
23 1985 1900 142.6 — — — — -7 -288 +63 61.9% +0.74 8–7 (53%) 12–5 (71%) 102.4 +0.02 1981 1459 107.5 — — — — +44 +75 — 34.9% -1.44 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — +1.57
24 1986 1882 145.3 — — — — +12 — — 56.1% +0.37 4–5 (44%) 5–4 (56%) 100.5 -2.28 1982 1484 104.0 — — — — -68 -7 +112 25.0% -2.15 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -0.61
25 1987 1900 145.8 — — — — +27 — — 64.3% +0.85 6–4 (60%) 7–2 (78%) 103.0 +0.37 1983 1758 132.1 — — — — -40 — -92 54.3% +0.41 9–4 (69%) 3–6 (33%) 108.3 +1.44
26 1988 1920 147.3 — — — — +7 — +50 71.4% +1.21 4–8 (33%) 12–3 (80%) 100.4 +2.17 1984 1668 132.8 — — — — +24 -136 -35 40.2% -0.94 5–9 (36%) 5–5 (50%) 98.4 -3.14
27 1989 1846 116.8 — — — — -9 — — 52.2% -0.09 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 96.3 +0.55 1985 1725 135.7 — — — — -9 — -76 43.7% -0.72 4–5 (44%) 7–4 (64%) 102.6 -1.50
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1678 104.5 — — — — -13 — — 40.0% -0.47 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.69
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1630 104.2 — — — — -23 — — 11.1% -2.67 0–1 — — -0.20
Career — 2099 155.7 — — — — +18 -226 -45 60.0% +0.67 66–75 (47%) 81–67 (55%) 98.1 -0.65 — 1801 126.5 — — — — -6 -14 -43 40.1% -0.88 24–32 (43%) 19–20 (49%) 100.6 -0.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.