H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Barbara Potter vs Kim Jones H2H: 2-1
Barbara Potter holds a 2–1 lead over Kim Jones in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Barbara Potter leads 2–1 on carpet. Most recently, Barbara Potter won the 1984 Tokyo Pan Pacific third round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 1984* | Tokyo Pan Pacific | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Barbara Potter | 6-1 6-1 | Kim Jones | Match data |
| Mar 23, 1984* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Kim Jones | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Barbara Potter | Match data |
| Oct 1, 1982* | Philadelphia | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Barbara Potter | 7-5 6-1 | Kim Jones | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Potter | #112 | #10 | 63 | 2,096 | 299 | 190 | 61.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| Kim Jones | — | — | — | 1,801 | 60 | 103 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Potter | Kim Jones | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1978 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1979 | 8–22 | 26.7% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1980 | 23–21 | 52.3% | — | 1,861 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1981 | 47–23 | 67.1% | — | 1,943 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1982 | 43–22 | 66.2% | — | 1,993 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 28–20 | 58.3% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,951 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 1–10 | 9.1% | — | 1,424 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1985 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #15 | 1,899 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1986 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #26 | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 4–14 | 22.2% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1987 | 25–13 | 65.8% | #12 | 1,894 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1988 | 36–14 | 72.0% | #10 | 1,918 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 13–24 | 35.1% | — | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1989 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,845 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 13–18 | 41.9% | — | 1,725 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |