H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Barbara Potter vs Mary Lou Piatek H2H: 2-2
Barbara Potter and Mary Lou Piatek are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on carpet. Most recently, Barbara Potter won the 1986 Oakland third round 7-6 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 1986* | Oakland | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Barbara Potter | 7-6 4-6 6-3 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
| Sep 24, 1983* | Richmond | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Barbara Potter | 6-3 6-2 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
| Jan 3, 1983 | Washington | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Mary Lou Piatek | 6-3 6-4 | Barbara Potter | Match data |
| Mar 12, 1981* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Mary Lou Piatek | 6-4 6-2 | Barbara Potter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Potter | #112 | #10 | 63 | 2,096 | 299 | 190 | 61.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| Mary Lou Piatek | — | — | — | 1,936 | 153 | 206 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Barbara Potter | Mary Lou Piatek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 8–22 | 26.7% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 23–21 | 52.3% | — | 1,861 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 47–23 | 67.1% | — | 1,943 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 |
| 1982 | 43–22 | 66.2% | — | 1,993 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 1 |
| 1983 | 28–20 | 58.3% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,951 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 |
| 1985 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #15 | 1,899 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 1986 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #26 | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 2 |
| 1987 | 25–13 | 65.8% | #12 | 1,894 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 2 |
| 1988 | 36–14 | 72.0% | #10 | 1,918 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 |
| 1989 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,845 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 2 |