H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Barbara Potter vs Raffaella Reggi Concato H2H: 2-0
Barbara Potter holds a 2–0 lead over Raffaella Reggi Concato in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Barbara Potter leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbara Potter won the 1984 Mahwah third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 64
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Age 60
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 1984* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Barbara Potter | 6-1 6-2 | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Match data |
| Dec 3, 1983* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Barbara Potter | 6-0 6-4 | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Potter | #112 | #10 | 63 | 2,096 | 299 | 190 | 61.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | — | — | — | 1,930 | 256 | 176 | 59.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Potter | Raffaella Reggi Concato | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1978 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,424 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1979 | 8–22 | 26.7% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1980 | 23–21 | 52.3% | — | 1,861 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1981 | 47–23 | 67.1% | — | 1,943 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1982 | 43–22 | 66.2% | — | 1,993 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 31–20 | 60.8% | — | 1,896 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1983 | 28–20 | 58.3% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 39–21 | 65.0% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1984 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,951 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1985 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #15 | 1,899 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 39–22 | 63.9% | — | 1,863 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1986 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #26 | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,818 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1987 | 25–13 | 65.8% | #12 | 1,894 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1988 | 36–14 | 72.0% | #10 | 1,918 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1989 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,845 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |