H2H data updated: 2026-10-18 00:00 UTC

Barbara Potter vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 1-0

Barbara Potter holds a 1–0 lead over Sandra Cecchini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Barbara Potter leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbara Potter won the 1985 Monticello quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Barbara Potter
USA Age 64 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Barbara Potter 6-4 6-3 Sandra Cecchini #39 Match data Aug 24, 1985* QF Monticello WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Barbara Potter #112 #8 63 2,098 303 191 61.3% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,936 300 217 58.0% 0 0 0 2 9 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbara Potter Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1978 4–7 36.4% — 1,532 0 0 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1979 8–22 26.7% — 1,620 0 0 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,484 0 0
18 1980 27–22 55.1% — 1,875 0 0 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,496 0 0
19 1981 47–23 67.1% #10 1,944 0 0 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1982 43–22 66.2% #8 1,998 0 2 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,747 0 2
21 1983 28–20 58.3% — 1,851 0 2 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,633 0 3
22 1984 35–17 67.3% #12 1,952 0 2 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,859 0 5
23 1985 31–16 66.0% #15 1,900 0 3 1988 34–15 69.4% #21 1,843 0 7
24 1986 14–10 58.3% #26 1,881 0 3 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1987 25–13 65.8% #12 1,899 0 4 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,814 0 9
26 1988 36–14 72.0% #10 1,919 0 5 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,773 0 10
27 1989 5–5 50.0% #106 1,845 0 5 1992 24–16 60.0% #34 1,824 0 11
28 — — — — — — — 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,726 0 11
29 — — — — — — — 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,841 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,628 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,608 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,555 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Barbara Potter Sandra Cecchini
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1978 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1979 4 8 12 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 1982 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1980 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 19 14 33 57.6% 1983 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1981 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 12 6 18 66.7% 27 14 41 65.9% 1984 12 4 16 75.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1982 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 28 10 38 73.7% 1985 6 7 13 46.2% 15 8 23 65.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1983 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 10 8 18 55.6% 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
22 1984 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 11 4 15 73.3% 17 9 26 65.4% 1987 8 4 12 66.7% 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1985 12 4 16 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 29 8 37 78.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1986 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1989 1 2 3 33.3% 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1987 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 17 7 24 70.8% 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 1988 25 9 34 73.5% — — — — 9 3 12 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 21 9 30 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1989 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 21 11 32 65.6% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 3 3 6 50.0% 15 10 25 60.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 3 2 5 60.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — —
Career — 89 54 143 62.2% 5 8 13 38.5% 68 39 107 63.6% 141 90 231 61.0% — 40 42 82 48.8% 236 140 376 62.8% 3 8 11 27.3% 21 26 47 44.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Barbara Potter Sandra Cecchini
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1978 1533 114.1 — — — — +58 — +55 35.7% -1.14 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +1.26 1981 1478 96.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.06
17 1979 1621 143.2 — — — — +30 -115 -41 30.3% -0.89 4–6 (40%) 1–8 (11%) 95.5 -1.66 1982 1484 101.9 — — — — — +37 — 44.4% +0.11 1–0 — — +0.59
18 1980 1876 153.1 — — — — +17 — -301 56.8% +0.53 4–11 (27%) 5–6 (45%) 94.6 +0.47 1983 1497 106.6 — — — — — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — +0.14
19 1981 1944 150.6 — — — — -2 — -145 63.1% +0.79 12–7 (63%) 9–10 (47%) 101.6 -1.65 1984 1652 123.4 — — — — +48 -80 -56 53.9% +0.38 5–7 (42%) 1–3 (25%) 96.6 +1.93
20 1982 1999 162.9 — — — — +57 — -127 63.3% +0.89 10–7 (59%) 12–14 (46%) 102.4 -2.52 1985 1747 132.3 — — — — -81 +43 — 51.1% -0.19 8–4 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 109.7 +0.73
21 1983 1852 139.4 — — — — +53 -246 +13 58.6% +0.77 6–9 (40%) 8–8 (50%) 93.0 +1.63 1986 1633 120.1 — — — — -64 +149 — 43.2% -0.53 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) 96.0 +0.35
22 1984 1953 157.7 — — — — -8 — -15 67.0% +1.24 3–7 (30%) 8–4 (67%) 94.3 -1.58 1987 1860 148.2 — — — — -142 +79 — 66.7% +1.10 7–6 (54%) 6–2 (75%) 103.4 +1.29
23 1985 1900 142.6 — — — — -7 -288 +63 61.9% +0.74 8–7 (53%) 12–5 (71%) 102.4 +0.02 1988 1844 145.8 — — — — -150 +156 — 64.2% +1.10 9–2 (82%) 5–2 (71%) 107.7 +2.39
24 1986 1882 145.3 — — — — +12 — — 56.1% +0.37 4–5 (44%) 5–4 (56%) 100.5 -2.28 1989 1799 128.9 — — — — -133 +134 — 59.4% +0.59 13–7 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 99.8 +3.83
25 1987 1900 145.8 — — — — +27 — — 64.3% +0.85 6–4 (60%) 7–2 (78%) 103.0 +0.37 1990 1815 140.6 — — — — -136 +130 — 60.0% +0.83 10–5 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 +0.82
26 1988 1920 147.3 — — — — +7 — +50 71.4% +1.21 4–8 (33%) 12–3 (80%) 100.4 +2.17 1991 1774 131.6 — — — — -137 +151 — 61.3% +0.68 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 100.3 +1.96
27 1989 1846 116.8 — — — — -9 — — 52.2% -0.09 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 96.3 +0.55 1992 1824 136.5 — — — — -222 +141 — 55.6% +0.29 8–2 (80%) 4–2 (67%) 107.8 +0.11
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1727 129.9 — — — — -151 +132 — 53.9% +0.20 5–5 (50%) 7–1 (88%) 101.3 -0.35
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1841 138.9 — — — — -123 +6 — 57.0% +0.51 14–5 (74%) 1–5 (17%) 101.9 +0.57
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1661 113.4 — — — — +36 +34 — 40.7% -0.54 4–4 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 95.9 +0.31
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1629 109.5 — — — — +14 +62 — 52.4% +0.05 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +1.57
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1608 106.4 — — — — — +32 — 39.1% -1.30 0–1 2–0 — -0.39
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1555 95.4 — — — — — +16 — 34.6% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.33
Career — 2099 155.7 — — — — +18 -226 -45 60.0% +0.67 66–75 (47%) 81–67 (55%) 98.1 -0.65 — 1937 137.9 — — — — -93 +97 -56 55.5% +0.35 98–62 (61%) 42–34 (55%) 106.0 +3.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.