H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Barbara Potter vs Sara Gomer H2H: 4-0
Barbara Potter holds a 4–0 lead over Sara Gomer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Barbara Potter leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Barbara Potter won the 1986 Dallas third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 64
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 62
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 1986* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Barbara Potter | 6-3 6-2 | Sara Gomer | Match data |
| Jun 28, 1985* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Barbara Potter | 6-4 7-5 | Sara Gomer | Match data |
| May 10, 1985* | Australian Indoor | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Barbara Potter | 6-2 6-0 | Sara Gomer | Match data |
| Jun 2, 1983* | Beckenham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Barbara Potter | 6-7 6-4 6-4 | Sara Gomer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Potter | #112 | #10 | 63 | 2,096 | 299 | 190 | 61.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| Sara Gomer | #317 | #46 | 18 | 1,778 | 104 | 130 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Potter | Sara Gomer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1978 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1979 | 8–22 | 26.7% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1980 | 23–21 | 52.3% | — | 1,861 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1981 | 47–23 | 67.1% | — | 1,943 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 43–22 | 66.2% | — | 1,993 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 28–20 | 58.3% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,951 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #59 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1985 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #15 | 1,899 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #72 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1986 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #26 | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #51 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1987 | 25–13 | 65.8% | #12 | 1,894 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #124 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1988 | 36–14 | 72.0% | #10 | 1,918 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1989 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,845 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #120 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #173 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |