H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Barbara Potter vs Stacy Margolin H2H: 3-0
Barbara Potter holds a 3–0 lead over Stacy Margolin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Barbara Potter leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Barbara Potter won the 1980 Tucson fourth round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 64
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
Age 67
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 1980* | Tucson | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Barbara Potter | 6-1 6-2 | Stacy Margolin | Match data |
| Sep 12, 1980* | Salt Lake City | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Barbara Potter | 5-7 6-4 7-6 | Stacy Margolin | Match data |
| Jun 20, 1979* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Barbara Potter | 4-6 6-1 9-7 | Stacy Margolin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Potter | #112 | #10 | 63 | 2,096 | 299 | 190 | 61.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| Stacy Margolin | — | — | — | 1,855 | 73 | 98 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Potter | Stacy Margolin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1978 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1979 | 8–22 | 26.7% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1980 | 23–21 | 52.3% | — | 1,861 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1981 | 47–23 | 67.1% | — | 1,943 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 16–5 | 76.2% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1982 | 43–22 | 66.2% | — | 1,993 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1983 | 28–20 | 58.3% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 25–26 | 49.0% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1984 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,951 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1985 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #15 | 1,899 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 4–14 | 22.2% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1986 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #26 | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1987 | 25–13 | 65.8% | #12 | 1,894 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1988 | 36–14 | 72.0% | #10 | 1,918 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1989 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,845 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |