H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Barbara Potter vs Stephanie Rehe H2H: 2-1
Barbara Potter holds a 2–1 lead over Stephanie Rehe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Barbara Potter leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Stephanie Rehe won the 1988 Key Biscayne quarterfinal 5-7 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 64
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 1988* | Key Biscayne | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Stephanie Rehe | 5-7 6-3 6-4 | Barbara Potter | Match data |
| Feb 12, 1988* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Barbara Potter | 6-2 6-2 | Stephanie Rehe | Match data |
| Aug 30, 1984* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Barbara Potter | 6-4 0-6 7-6 | Stephanie Rehe | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Potter | #112 | #10 | 63 | 2,096 | 299 | 190 | 61.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| Stephanie Rehe | #156 | #10 | 60 | 2,000 | 134 | 98 | 57.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Potter | Stephanie Rehe | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #182 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #18 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | 1978 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #19 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1979 | 8–22 | 26.7% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 17–8 | 68.0% | #28 | 1,868 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 1980 | 23–21 | 52.3% | — | 1,861 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #14 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | 1981 | 47–23 | 67.1% | — | 1,943 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1982 | 43–22 | 66.2% | — | 1,993 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #58 | 1,968 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1983 | 28–20 | 58.3% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #123 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1984 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,951 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #74 | 1,744 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1985 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #15 | 1,899 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #156 | 1,758 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1986 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #26 | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1987 | 25–13 | 65.8% | #12 | 1,894 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1988 | 36–14 | 72.0% | #10 | 1,918 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1989 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,845 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |