H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Barbara Rittner vs Angelica Gavaldon H2H: 2-0

Barbara Rittner holds a 2–0 lead over Angelica Gavaldon in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Barbara Rittner leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbara Rittner won the 1995 Hamburg Open round of 16 6-4 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Barbara Rittner
GER Age 53 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Angelica Gavaldon
MEX Age 52 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Barbara Rittner #40 6-4 6-0 Angelica Gavaldon #43 Match data May 5, 1995* R16 Hamburg Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Barbara Rittner #43 6-3 6-3 Angelica Gavaldon #257 Match data Oct 24, 1991* R32 San Juan Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Barbara Rittner #438 #24 661 1,896 211 218 49.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Angelica Gavaldon #434 #34 237 1,735 75 111 40.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbara Rittner Angelica Gavaldon
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1988 1–3 25.0% #264 1,499 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1989 2–4 33.3% #191 1,501 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1990 16–16 50.0% #51 1,601 0 0
17 1990 3–3 50.0% #110 1,557 0 0 1991 1–6 14.3% #242 1,556 0 0
18 1991 20–17 54.1% #43 1,708 0 0 1992 5–10 33.3% #142 1,577 0 0
19 1992 25–16 61.0% #29 1,850 0 1 1993 19–20 48.7% #64 1,613 0 0
20 1993 24–17 58.5% #34 1,843 0 1 1994 9–16 36.0% #119 1,605 0 0
21 1994 25–18 58.1% #40 1,819 0 1 1995 17–17 50.0% #36 1,677 0 0
22 1995 17–17 50.0% #51 1,729 0 1 1996 3–11 21.4% #219 1,593 0 0
23 1996 12–16 42.9% #47 1,727 0 1 1997 1–5 16.7% #107 1,527 0 0
24 1997 10–17 37.0% #71 1,652 0 1 1998 0–1 0.0% #697 1,521 0 0
25 1998 13–14 48.1% #66 1,663 0 1 1999 0–1 0.0% #379 1,515 0 0
26 1999 15–18 45.5% #59 1,654 0 1 2000 1–1 50.0% #261 1,526 0 0
27 2000 10–12 45.5% #99 1,661 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2001 16–18 47.1% #68 1,618 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2002 14–19 42.4% #66 1,631 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2003 6–14 30.0% #120 1,567 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2004 1–2 33.3% #235 1,570 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Barbara Rittner Angelica Gavaldon
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 13 10 23 56.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
17 1990 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1991 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1991 11 10 21 52.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 1992 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1992 13 7 20 65.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1993 12 11 23 52.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
20 1993 13 10 23 56.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1994 7 9 16 43.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1994 11 8 19 57.9% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1995 12 9 21 57.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1995 6 8 14 42.9% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1996 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 1996 5 6 11 45.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1997 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1997 3 7 10 30.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1998 2 4 6 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1999 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1999 3 4 7 42.9% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2000 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 2 3 5 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 6 9 15 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 6 10 16 37.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 2 7 9 22.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 83 93 176 47.2% 73 74 147 49.7% 18 19 37 48.6% 37 32 69 53.6% — 55 71 126 43.7% 13 21 34 38.2% 5 9 14 35.7% 2 10 12 16.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Barbara Rittner Angelica Gavaldon
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1500 105.9 — — — — +36 — — 33.3% -1.44 0–1 0–1 — +0.09
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1501 104.0 — — — — +24 — — 35.7% -1.14 1–1 1–0 — +0.22
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1601 123.4 — — — — +41 -70 -31 48.0% -0.39 7–4 (64%) 2–2 (50%) 105.8 +1.11
17 1990 1557 121.6 — — — — +35 — — 36.4% -1.18 1–0 1–0 — -0.40 1991 1557 107.9 — — — — +21 — — 23.5% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.31
18 1991 1709 130.4 — — — — +4 -111 — 52.9% +0.15 7–6 (54%) 5–2 (71%) 106.0 +1.01 1992 1578 119.9 — — — — -6 -9 — 29.0% -1.29 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -0.47
19 1992 1850 151.2 — — — — -12 -152 -246 57.8% +0.43 5–2 (71%) 3–4 (43%) 103.8 -1.88 1993 1613 127.0 — — — — +4 -19 -41 49.4% -0.03 5–6 (45%) 3–4 (43%) 99.4 +0.85
20 1993 1844 151.4 — — — — +11 -88 — 60.9% +0.72 2–7 (22%) 6–4 (60%) 96.7 -1.04 1994 1605 119.4 — — — — +7 -4 — 35.3% -0.88 3–0 (100%) 1–6 (14%) 100.2 -0.02
21 1994 1820 146.5 — — — — +35 -80 -177 58.9% +0.85 7–6 (54%) 1–3 (25%) 96.8 -1.12 1995 1678 132.9 — — — — 0 -76 -137 48.6% -0.23 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 106.9 +0.35
22 1995 1729 138.0 — — — — +52 -26 — 53.9% +0.47 5–7 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 96.7 -0.26 1996 1593 116.6 — — — — +13 — — 25.8% -1.71 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 96.1 -0.12
23 1996 1728 144.8 — — — — +59 -24 — 46.7% -0.05 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — -1.28 1997 1528 94.3 — — — — +25 +52 — 28.6% -1.79 0–2 — — +0.66
24 1997 1653 135.9 — — — — +28 +52 -38 42.9% -0.07 4–6 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 96.6 -1.13 1998 1522 — — — — — — — — — — — — — -0.13
25 1998 1664 132.7 — — — — -29 +97 — 48.4% +0.21 4–6 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 99.2 -0.20 1999 1515 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.20
26 1999 1655 126.4 — — — — +7 +43 -46 45.8% -0.24 5–5 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -0.69 2000 1526 104.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.40 1–0 — — +0.09
27 2000 1661 124.8 — — — — +33 -20 -41 48.1% 0.00 5–5 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 98.8 -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 1619 127.0 — — — — +17 +56 +14 50.6% +0.30 5–8 (38%) 6–4 (60%) 97.9 -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1632 131.4 — — — — 0 +51 -45 44.7% -0.11 8–6 (57%) 3–6 (33%) 100.7 -0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 1568 107.0 -0.66 -2.21 0.611 40.9% -12 +39 +86 35.4% -1.04 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 97.2 -0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 1571 109.3 -1.05 +2.64 0.990 49.4% — +36 — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1897 144.7 -0.82 -0.27 0.767 44.3% +16 -11 -47 50.7% +0.17 61–74 (45%) 39–39 (50%) 96.9 -2.27 — 1735 127.2 — — — — +13 -28 -69 41.0% -0.69 25–21 (54%) 14–21 (40%) 101.4 +1.14

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.