H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Barbara Rittner vs Asa Carlsson H2H: 2-1
Barbara Rittner holds a 2–1 lead over Asa Carlsson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Barbara Rittner leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Barbara Rittner won the 2000 Luxembourg third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2000* | Luxembourg | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Barbara Rittner | 6-4 6-2 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
| Jul 13, 2000* | Klagenfurt | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Barbara Rittner | 6-1 6-2 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
| Mar 24, 1994* | Houston | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Asa Carlsson | 6-2 6-4 | Barbara Rittner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Rittner | #438 | #24 | 661 | 1,883 | 209 | 217 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Asa Carlsson | #1,024 | #28 | 831 | 1,816 | 128 | 171 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Barbara Rittner | Asa Carlsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1990 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #164 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #29 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #70 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #34 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #49 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #40 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #39 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #45 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #92 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #71 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #66 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #59 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #102 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #99 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #78 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 |
| 2001 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #68 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #345 | 1,496 | 0 | 2 |
| 2002 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #66 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #207 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |
| 2003 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #235 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |