H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Barbara Rittner vs Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy H2H: 3-1

Barbara Rittner holds a 3–1 lead over Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Barbara Rittner leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbara Rittner won the 1996 US Open second round 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Barbara Rittner
GER Age 53 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
NED Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 29, 1996* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Barbara Rittner #63 6-2 6-1 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #13 Match data
Aug 18, 1993* Montreal WTA 1000 R64 Hard Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #32 7-5 7-6 Barbara Rittner #30 Match data
Aug 30, 1992* Schenectady WTA 250 F Hard Barbara Rittner #28 7-6 6-3 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #32 Match data
Jan 15, 1992* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Barbara Rittner #42 6-1 3-6 6-4 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #30 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Barbara Rittner #438 #24 661 1,883 209 217 49.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #919 #9 1,672 2,025 295 220 57.3% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbara Rittner Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1987 5–6 45.5% #149 1,515 0 0
17 1990 3–3 50.0% #110 1,557 0 0 1988 21–18 53.8% #40 1,689 0 0
18 1991 20–17 54.1% #43 1,708 0 0 1989 15–22 40.5% #83 1,603 0 0
19 1992 23–15 60.5% #29 1,829 0 1 1990 18–17 51.4% #43 1,677 0 0
20 1993 24–17 58.5% #34 1,838 0 1 1991 24–19 55.8% #30 1,799 0 1
21 1994 25–18 58.1% #40 1,818 0 1 1992 30–20 60.0% #33 1,818 0 2
22 1995 17–17 50.0% #51 1,728 0 1 1993 26–20 56.5% #40 1,789 0 3
23 1996 12–16 42.9% #47 1,728 0 1 1994 44–21 67.7% #15 1,885 0 3
24 1997 10–17 37.0% #71 1,653 0 1 1995 37–15 71.2% #13 1,970 0 5
25 1998 13–14 48.1% #66 1,664 0 1 1996 35–18 66.0% #12 1,908 0 6
26 1999 15–18 45.5% #59 1,655 0 1 1997 34–25 57.6% #15 1,855 0 7
27 2000 10–12 45.5% #99 1,661 0 1 1998 3–10 23.1% #188 1,673 0 7
28 2001 16–18 47.1% #68 1,618 0 2 1999 0–1 0.0% #893 1,651 0 7
29 2002 14–19 42.4% #66 1,632 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2003 6–14 30.0% #120 1,568 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2004 1–2 33.3% #235 1,571 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — 2006 2–3 40.0% #299 1,642 0 7
36 — — — — — — — 2007 1–3 25.0% #190 1,614 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #391 1,592 0 7