H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Barbara Rittner vs Claudia Kohde Kilsch H2H: 0-1
Claudia Kohde Kilsch holds a 1–0 lead over Barbara Rittner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Claudia Kohde Kilsch leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Claudia Kohde Kilsch won the 1990 Leipzig fourth round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 62
Right-Handed
187 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 1990* | Leipzig | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | 6-1 6-0 | Barbara Rittner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Rittner | #438 | #24 | 661 | 1,883 | 209 | 217 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | #387 | #4 | 77 | 2,157 | 401 | 233 | 63.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Rittner | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 36–18 | 66.7% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1990 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | 1991 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 34–23 | 59.6% | — | 1,914 | 0 | 8 |
| 19 | 1992 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #29 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 29–20 | 59.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 8 |
| 20 | 1993 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #34 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #8 | 2,014 | 0 | 9 |
| 21 | 1994 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #40 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #5 | 2,115 | 0 | 10 |
| 22 | 1995 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #7 | 2,049 | 0 | 10 |
| 23 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #10 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #71 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 39–18 | 68.4% | #12 | 1,952 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 1998 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #66 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #37 | 1,856 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 1999 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #59 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #46 | 1,792 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 2000 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #99 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #85 | 1,682 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 2001 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #68 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #78 | 1,647 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 2002 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #66 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2003 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #235 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |