H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Barbara Rittner vs Claudia Porwik H2H: 1-0
Barbara Rittner holds a 1–0 lead over Claudia Porwik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Barbara Rittner leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbara Rittner won the 1991 Wellington third round 6-2 2-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 1991* | Wellington | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Barbara Rittner | 6-2 2-6 7-5 | Claudia Porwik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Rittner | #438 | #24 | 661 | 1,883 | 209 | 217 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Claudia Porwik | #579 | #29 | 148 | 1,788 | 114 | 146 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Rittner | Claudia Porwik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1990 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #96 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1991 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #104 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #29 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #68 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #34 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #75 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #40 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #29 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #80 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #71 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #92 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #66 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #256 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #59 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #99 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #153 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #68 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2002 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #66 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2003 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #235 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |