H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Barbara Rittner vs Els Callens H2H: 1-1
Barbara Rittner and Els Callens are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Barbara Rittner leads 1–0 on clay, while Els Callens leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Els Callens won the 2003 Wimbledon first round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2003* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Els Callens | 6-3 7-5 | Barbara Rittner | Match data |
| May 14, 1997* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Barbara Rittner | 6-1 6-0 | Els Callens | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Rittner | #438 | #24 | 661 | 1,883 | 209 | 217 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Els Callens | #473 | #43 | 582 | 1,716 | 82 | 127 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Rittner | Els Callens | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1990 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1991 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1992 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #29 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #34 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #40 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #188 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #110 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #71 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #95 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #66 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #51 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #59 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #98 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #99 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #102 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #68 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2002 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #66 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #100 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2003 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #235 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #67 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #73 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #224 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |