H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Barbara Rittner vs Erika De Lone H2H: 1-1
Barbara Rittner and Erika De Lone are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbara Rittner won the 2001 Australian Open first round 2-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2001* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Barbara Rittner | 2-6 6-3 6-3 | Erika De Lone | Match data |
| Mar 6, 1991* | Boca Raton | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Erika De Lone | 3-6 6-1 7-6 | Barbara Rittner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Rittner | #438 | #24 | 661 | 1,883 | 209 | 217 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Erika De Lone | #425 | #65 | 501 | 1,603 | 42 | 100 | 29.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Rittner | Erika De Lone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #298 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1990 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1991 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #110 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #29 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #34 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #40 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #200 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #124 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #131 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #71 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #66 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #178 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #59 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #67 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #99 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #68 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2002 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #66 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2003 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #235 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |