H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Barbara Rittner vs Fang Li H2H: 1-0
Barbara Rittner holds a 1–0 lead over Fang Li in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Barbara Rittner leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbara Rittner won the 1993 US Open first round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 1993* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Barbara Rittner | 6-3 6-0 | Fang Li | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Rittner | #438 | #24 | 661 | 1,883 | 209 | 217 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Fang Li | #488 | #36 | 723 | 1,705 | 67 | 89 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Barbara Rittner | Fang Li | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1990 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #119 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #29 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #34 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #40 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #71 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #66 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #503 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #59 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #488 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #99 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #68 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #66 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #235 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |