H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Barbara Rittner vs Flora Perfetti H2H: 1-2
Flora Perfetti holds a 2–1 lead over Barbara Rittner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Flora Perfetti leads 2–0 on clay, while Barbara Rittner leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Flora Perfetti won the 1996 Palermo third round 3-6 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 57
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 1996* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Flora Perfetti | 3-6 6-4 6-1 | Barbara Rittner | Match data |
| Feb 23, 1995* | Linz | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Barbara Rittner | 6-2 4-6 6-3 | Flora Perfetti | Match data |
| May 6, 1992* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Flora Perfetti | 6-2 6-2 | Barbara Rittner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Rittner | #438 | #24 | 661 | 1,883 | 209 | 217 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Flora Perfetti | #415 | #54 | 419 | 1,600 | 31 | 59 | 34.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Rittner | Flora Perfetti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1990 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1991 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1992 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #29 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #34 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #40 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1995 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #108 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #71 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #315 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #66 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1999 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #59 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #99 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #69 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #68 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #102 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2002 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #66 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2003 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #225 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #235 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |