H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Barbara Rittner vs Judith Wiesner H2H: 1-2
Judith Wiesner holds a 2–1 lead over Barbara Rittner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Judith Wiesner leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Judith Wiesner won the 1994 Schenectady quarterfinal 7-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 60
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 1994* | Schenectady | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Judith Wiesner | 7-6 6-1 | Barbara Rittner | Match data |
| Jan 13, 1994* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Barbara Rittner | 6-2 6-3 | Judith Wiesner | Match data |
| Oct 2, 1993* | Leipzig | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Judith Wiesner | 6-7 7-5 6-2 | Barbara Rittner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Rittner | #438 | #24 | 661 | 1,883 | 209 | 217 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Judith Wiesner | #48 | #12 | 1,590 | 1,979 | 302 | 177 | 63.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Rittner | Judith Wiesner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1990 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1991 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1992 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #29 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #34 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #40 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #33 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,751 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #35 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #71 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #17 | 1,845 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1998 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #66 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1999 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #59 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #25 | 1,916 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2000 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #99 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,906 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2001 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #68 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #25 | 1,893 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2002 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #66 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2003 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #15 | 1,925 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #235 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #48 | 1,829 | 0 | 5 |