H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Barbara Rittner vs Julie Halard-Decugis H2H: 2-2

Barbara Rittner and Julie Halard-Decugis are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Julie Halard-Decugis won the 1995 Manhattan Beach round of 32 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Barbara Rittner
GER Age 53 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Julie Halard-Decugis
FRA Age 56 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Julie Halard-Decugis #27 6-4 6-2 Barbara Rittner #42 Match data Aug 10, 1995* R32 Manhattan Beach Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Barbara Rittner #35 6-1 6-4 Julie Halard-Decugis #28 Match data Oct 15, 1993* R16 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Julie Halard-Decugis #21 5-7 6-1 7-6 Barbara Rittner #43 Match data Oct 26, 1991* QF San Juan Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Barbara Rittner #76 6-2 6-0 Julie Halard-Decugis #26 Match data Aug 29, 1991* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Barbara Rittner #438 #24 661 1,896 211 218 49.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Julie Halard-Decugis #15 #7 2,030 2,024 340 221 60.6% 0 0 0 2 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbara Rittner Julie Halard-Decugis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1987 9–5 64.3% #62 1,643 0 0
17 1990 3–3 50.0% #110 1,557 0 0 1988 11–15 42.3% #75 1,612 0 0
18 1991 20–17 54.1% #43 1,708 0 0 1989 10–16 38.5% #118 1,624 0 0
19 1992 25–16 61.0% #29 1,850 0 1 1990 20–16 55.6% #41 1,707 0 0
20 1993 24–17 58.5% #34 1,843 0 1 1991 44–23 65.7% #20 1,820 0 1
21 1994 25–18 58.1% #40 1,819 0 1 1992 23–14 62.2% #27 1,819 0 2
22 1995 17–17 50.0% #51 1,729 0 1 1993 26–18 59.1% #29 1,819 0 2
23 1996 12–16 42.9% #47 1,727 0 1 1994 38–21 64.4% #21 1,889 0 3
24 1997 10–17 37.0% #71 1,652 0 1 1995 19–15 55.9% #50 1,770 0 4
25 1998 13–14 48.1% #66 1,663 0 1 1996 28–10 73.7% #20 1,856 0 6
26 1999 15–18 45.5% #59 1,654 0 1 1997 0–1 0.0% #178 1,843 0 6
27 2000 10–12 45.5% #99 1,661 0 1 1998 34–21 61.8% #22 1,916 0 8
28 2001 16–18 47.1% #68 1,618 0 2 1999 47–22 68.1% #9 1,930 0 10
29 2002 14–19 42.4% #66 1,631 0 2 2000 31–24 56.4% #15 1,837 0 12
30 2003 6–14 30.0% #120 1,567 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2004 1–2 33.3% #235 1,570 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Barbara Rittner Julie Halard-Decugis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 2 1 3 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1990 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1988 3 4 7 42.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1991 11 10 21 52.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 1989 2 5 7 28.6% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 1992 13 7 20 65.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1990 10 6 16 62.5% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
20 1993 13 10 23 56.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1991 26 13 39 66.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1994 11 8 19 57.9% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1992 4 6 10 40.0% 16 5 21 76.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1995 6 8 14 42.9% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1993 19 11 30 63.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
23 1996 5 6 11 45.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1994 19 14 33 57.6% 14 3 17 82.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
24 1997 3 7 10 30.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1995 8 8 16 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
25 1998 2 4 6 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1996 13 4 17 76.5% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7%
26 1999 3 4 7 42.9% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 2 3 5 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1998 18 12 30 60.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2001 6 9 15 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 22 11 33 66.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 6 11 45.5%
29 2002 6 10 16 37.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 2000 18 13 31 58.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 5 9 44.4%
30 2003 2 7 9 22.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 83 93 176 47.2% 73 74 147 49.7% 18 19 37 48.6% 37 32 69 53.6% — 164 109 273 60.1% 117 62 179 65.4% 31 17 48 64.6% 28 33 61 45.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Barbara Rittner Julie Halard-Decugis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1643 124.0 — — — — -39 +21 — 58.8% 0.00 4–2 (67%) 5–1 (83%) 107.7 +1.12
17 1990 1557 121.6 — — — — +35 — — 36.4% -1.18 1–0 1–0 — -0.40 1988 1612 123.0 — — — — -40 +60 -85 45.0% -0.08 3–5 (38%) 2–7 (22%) 95.8 -0.31
18 1991 1709 130.4 — — — — +4 -111 — 52.9% +0.15 7–6 (54%) 5–2 (71%) 106.0 +1.01 1989 1625 118.1 — — — — -29 -13 — 39.7% -0.70 6–5 (55%) 2–4 (33%) 100.4 -0.36
19 1992 1850 151.2 — — — — -12 -152 -246 57.8% +0.43 5–2 (71%) 3–4 (43%) 103.8 -1.88 1990 1708 138.4 — — — — -46 +7 -172 52.9% +0.32 8–5 (62%) 2–5 (29%) 102.8 -1.86
20 1993 1844 151.4 — — — — +11 -88 — 60.9% +0.72 2–7 (22%) 6–4 (60%) 96.7 -1.04 1991 1821 141.7 — — — — -31 +28 -239 59.2% +0.73 18–5 (78%) 5–1 (83%) 112.4 +1.15
21 1994 1820 146.5 — — — — +35 -80 -177 58.9% +0.85 7–6 (54%) 1–3 (25%) 96.8 -1.12 1992 1819 144.0 — — — — -103 +139 -169 57.1% +0.49 8–2 (80%) 3–5 (38%) 104.1 -1.82
22 1995 1729 138.0 — — — — +52 -26 — 53.9% +0.47 5–7 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 96.7 -0.26 1993 1819 145.9 — — — — +15 +29 — 59.2% +0.48 6–6 (50%) 9–2 (82%) 105.4 +1.92
23 1996 1728 144.8 — — — — +59 -24 — 46.7% -0.05 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — -1.28 1994 1890 153.5 — — — — -51 +106 — 60.0% +0.46 14–8 (64%) 8–5 (62%) 105.4 -0.05
24 1997 1653 135.9 — — — — +28 +52 -38 42.9% -0.07 4–6 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 96.6 -1.13 1995 1771 131.9 — — — — -28 +220 — 55.1% +0.33 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 97.1 +0.60
25 1998 1664 132.7 — — — — -29 +97 — 48.4% +0.21 4–6 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 99.2 -0.20 1996 1856 152.1 — — — — -18 +132 — 69.0% +1.29 7–4 (64%) 6–2 (75%) 101.2 -0.28
26 1999 1655 126.4 — — — — +7 +43 -46 45.8% -0.24 5–5 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -0.69 1997 1843 108.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.22
27 2000 1661 124.8 — — — — +33 -20 -41 48.1% 0.00 5–5 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 98.8 -0.48 1998 1917 157.6 — — — — -29 +48 -109 60.5% +0.78 7–7 (50%) 8–6 (57%) 100.1 -3.44
28 2001 1619 127.0 — — — — +17 +56 +14 50.6% +0.30 5–8 (38%) 6–4 (60%) 97.9 -0.24 1999 1930 160.9 — — — — -32 +91 -17 63.8% +0.88 14–5 (74%) 8–4 (67%) 110.3 +0.13
29 2002 1632 131.4 — — — — 0 +51 -45 44.7% -0.11 8–6 (57%) 3–6 (33%) 100.7 -0.85 2000 1837 145.6 — — — — +5 +79 +214 52.5% +0.20 10–4 (71%) 5–4 (56%) 102.6 +1.49
30 2003 1568 107.0 -0.66 -2.21 0.611 40.9% -12 +39 +86 35.4% -1.04 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 97.2 -0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 1571 109.3 -1.05 +2.64 0.990 49.4% — +36 — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1897 144.7 -0.82 -0.27 0.767 44.3% +16 -11 -47 50.7% +0.17 61–74 (45%) 39–39 (50%) 96.9 -2.27 — 2024 152.3 — — — — -27 +76 -46 57.5% +0.49 110–64 (63%) 67–50 (57%) 111.7 -0.35

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.