H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Barbara Rittner vs Julie Halard-Decugis H2H: 2-2
Barbara Rittner and Julie Halard-Decugis are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Julie Halard-Decugis won the 1995 Manhattan Beach third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 55
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 1995* | Manhattan Beach | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Julie Halard-Decugis | 6-4 6-2 | Barbara Rittner | Match data |
| Oct 15, 1993* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Barbara Rittner | 6-1 6-4 | Julie Halard-Decugis | Match data |
| Oct 26, 1991* | San Juan | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Julie Halard-Decugis | 5-7 6-1 7-6 | Barbara Rittner | Match data |
| Aug 29, 1991* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Barbara Rittner | 6-2 6-0 | Julie Halard-Decugis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Rittner | #438 | #24 | 661 | 1,883 | 209 | 217 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Julie Halard-Decugis | #15 | #7 | 2,030 | 2,003 | 337 | 219 | 60.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Rittner | Julie Halard-Decugis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #62 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1990 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #75 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1991 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #29 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #34 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1994 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #40 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1995 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,890 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #71 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1998 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #66 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 28–10 | 73.7% | #20 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1999 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #59 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2000 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #99 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,917 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2001 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #68 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #9 | 1,920 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2002 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #66 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #15 | 1,829 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 2003 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #235 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |