H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Barbara Rittner vs Larisa Savchenko H2H: 2-1
Barbara Rittner holds a 2–1 lead over Larisa Savchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Barbara Rittner leads 2–0 on clay, while Larisa Savchenko leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Barbara Rittner won the 1994 Berlin second round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
URS
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 1994* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Barbara Rittner | 6-4 6-3 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
| Mar 31, 1994* | Hilton Head | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Barbara Rittner | 6-3 6-7 6-1 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
| Sep 29, 1991* | St. Petersburg | WTA 500 | F | Carpet | Larisa Savchenko | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Barbara Rittner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Rittner | #438 | #24 | 661 | 1,883 | 209 | 217 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Larisa Savchenko | #305 | #13 | 454 | 1,926 | 238 | 239 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Barbara Rittner | Larisa Savchenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1990 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #29 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #55 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #34 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #40 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,887 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #71 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #91 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #66 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #59 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #99 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 2001 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #68 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #41 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 |
| 2002 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #66 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #99 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 2003 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #61 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #235 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |