H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Barbara Rittner vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 1-1

Barbara Rittner and Lori Mcneil are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lori Mcneil leads 1–0 on carpet, while Barbara Rittner leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1995 Tokyo third round 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Barbara Rittner
GER Age 53 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 3, 1995* Tokyo WTA 1000 R32 Carpet Lori Mcneil #20 7-5 6-3 Barbara Rittner #43 Match data
Mar 16, 1992* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R32 Hard Barbara Rittner #28 7-6 4-6 6-3 Lori Mcneil #20 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Barbara Rittner #438 #24 661 1,883 209 217 49.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbara Rittner Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1990 3–3 50.0% #110 1,557 0 0 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1991 20–17 54.1% #43 1,708 0 0 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1992 23–15 60.5% #29 1,829 0 1 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,569 0 1
20 1993 24–17 58.5% #34 1,838 0 1 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1
21 1994 25–18 58.1% #40 1,818 0 1 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1995 17–17 50.0% #51 1,728 0 1 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1996 12–16 42.9% #47 1,728 0 1 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3
24 1997 10–17 37.0% #71 1,653 0 1 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5
25 1998 13–14 48.1% #66 1,664 0 1 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 1999 15–18 45.5% #59 1,655 0 1 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6
27 2000 10–12 45.5% #99 1,661 0 1 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 2001 16–18 47.1% #68 1,618 0 2 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 2002 14–19 42.4% #66 1,632 0 2 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 2003 6–14 30.0% #120 1,568 0 2 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 2004 1–2 33.3% #235 1,571 0 2 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11
34 — — — — — — — 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11