H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Barbara Rittner vs Lubomira Bacheva H2H: 1-1
Barbara Rittner and Lubomira Bacheva are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Barbara Rittner won the 2001 Antwerp fourth round 6-2 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BUL
Age 51
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2001* | Antwerp | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Barbara Rittner | 6-2 7-6(2) | Lubomira Bacheva | Match data |
| May 16, 2000* | Antwerp | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Lubomira Bacheva | 7-6(6) 6-2 | Barbara Rittner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Rittner | #438 | #24 | 661 | 1,883 | 209 | 217 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Lubomira Bacheva | #1,157 | #68 | 445 | 1,523 | 27 | 56 | 32.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Rittner | Lubomira Bacheva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #289 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1990 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #185 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1991 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #251 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #29 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #34 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #40 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1995 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #71 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #73 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #66 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #96 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #59 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #113 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #99 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #158 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #68 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2002 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #66 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #224 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2003 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #235 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |