H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Barbara Rittner vs Manuela Maleeva Fragniere H2H: 0-1
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere holds a 1–0 lead over Barbara Rittner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere won the 1992 Roland Garros second round 5-7 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 59
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 1992* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 5-7 6-1 6-2 | Barbara Rittner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Rittner | #438 | #24 | 661 | 1,883 | 209 | 217 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | #5 | #3 | 148 | 2,128 | 458 | 183 | 71.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 19 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Rittner | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 21–16 | 56.8% | — | 1,788 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1990 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 50–16 | 75.8% | #6 | 2,098 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | 1991 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #7 | 2,073 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | 1992 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #29 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #10 | 1,991 | 0 | 6 |
| 20 | 1993 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #34 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,111 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1994 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #40 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 42–14 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,091 | 0 | 10 |
| 22 | 1995 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #9 | 2,016 | 0 | 12 |
| 23 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #9 | 2,067 | 0 | 12 |
| 24 | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #71 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 43–14 | 75.4% | #10 | 2,027 | 0 | 15 |
| 25 | 1998 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #66 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,994 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | 1999 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #59 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,045 | 0 | 18 |
| 27 | 2000 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #99 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 12–2 | 85.7% | #5 | 2,066 | 0 | 19 |
| 28 | 2001 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #68 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2002 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #66 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2003 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #235 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |