H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Barbara Rittner vs Maria Strandlund Tomsvik H2H: 1-0

Barbara Rittner holds a 1–0 lead over Maria Strandlund Tomsvik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Barbara Rittner leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbara Rittner won the 1991 Wellington round of 16 6-3 4-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Barbara Rittner
GER Age 53 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Maria Strandlund Tomsvik
SWE

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Barbara Rittner #99 6-3 4-6 6-2 Maria Strandlund Tomsvik Match data Feb 8, 1991* R16 Wellington Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Barbara Rittner #438 #24 661 1,896 211 218 49.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Maria Strandlund Tomsvik — — — 1,625 42 77 35.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Barbara Rittner Maria Strandlund Tomsvik
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1990 3–3 50.0% #110 1,557 0 0 1987 1–1 50.0% — 1,504 0 0
1991 20–17 54.1% #43 1,708 0 0 1988 6–7 46.2% — 1,578 0 0
1992 25–16 61.0% #29 1,850 0 1 1989 10–14 41.7% — 1,611 0 0
1993 24–17 58.5% #34 1,843 0 1 1990 7–16 30.4% — 1,588 0 0
1994 25–18 58.1% #40 1,819 0 1 1991 6–12 33.3% — 1,553 0 0
1995 17–17 50.0% #51 1,729 0 1 1992 0–3 0.0% — 1,520 0 0
1996 12–16 42.9% #47 1,727 0 1 1993 2–3 40.0% — 1,559 0 0
1997 10–17 37.0% #71 1,652 0 1 1994 0–2 0.0% — 1,546 0 0
1998 13–14 48.1% #66 1,663 0 1 1995 8–13 38.1% — 1,545 0 0
1999 15–18 45.5% #59 1,654 0 1 1996 2–5 28.6% — 1,526 0 0
2000 10–12 45.5% #99 1,661 0 1 1997 0–1 0.0% — 1,515 0 0
2001 16–18 47.1% #68 1,618 0 2 — — — — — — —
2002 14–19 42.4% #66 1,631 0 2 — — — — — — —
2003 6–14 30.0% #120 1,567 0 2 — — — — — — —
2004 1–2 33.3% #235 1,570 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Barbara Rittner Maria Strandlund Tomsvik
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1990 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1987 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
1991 11 10 21 52.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 1988 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
1992 13 7 20 65.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1989 4 6 10 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
1993 13 10 23 56.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1990 5 9 14 35.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1994 11 8 19 57.9% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
1995 6 8 14 42.9% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1992 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
1996 5 6 11 45.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1993 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
1997 3 7 10 30.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
1998 2 4 6 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1995 4 3 7 57.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
1999 3 4 7 42.9% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
2000 2 3 5 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1997 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
2001 6 9 15 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2002 6 10 16 37.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2003 2 7 9 22.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2004 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 83 93 176 47.2% 73 74 147 49.7% 18 19 37 48.6% 37 32 69 53.6% Career 19 28 47 40.4% 14 30 44 31.8% 6 9 15 40.0% 3 10 13 23.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Barbara Rittner Maria Strandlund Tomsvik
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1990 1557 121.6 — — — — +35 — — 36.4% -1.18 1–0 1–0 — -0.40 1987 1504 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +1.20 0–1 — — +0.37
1991 1709 130.4 — — — — +4 -111 — 52.9% +0.15 7–6 (54%) 5–2 (71%) 106.0 +1.01 1988 1578 125.8 — — — — +10 -8 — 45.5% -0.15 4–3 (57%) 1–2 (33%) 102.9 +0.45
1992 1850 151.2 — — — — -12 -152 -246 57.8% +0.43 5–2 (71%) 3–4 (43%) 103.8 -1.88 1989 1612 115.4 — — — — -1 -33 — 44.3% -0.85 6–7 (46%) 1–1 — +0.30
1993 1844 151.4 — — — — +11 -88 — 60.9% +0.72 2–7 (22%) 6–4 (60%) 96.7 -1.04 1990 1589 112.6 — — — — +13 -55 — 32.7% -1.00 5–3 (63%) 0–5 (0%) 99.0 -0.92
1994 1820 146.5 — — — — +35 -80 -177 58.9% +0.85 7–6 (54%) 1–3 (25%) 96.8 -1.12 1991 1554 113.6 — — — — -13 -34 +68 35.7% -0.98 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.8 -0.11
1995 1729 138.0 — — — — +52 -26 — 53.9% +0.47 5–7 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 96.7 -0.26 1992 1520 104.3 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.32
1996 1728 144.8 — — — — +59 -24 — 46.7% -0.05 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — -1.28 1993 1560 135.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.42 2–0 0–1 — -0.82
1997 1653 135.9 — — — — +28 +52 -38 42.9% -0.07 4–6 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 96.6 -1.13 1994 1546 102.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — 0–2 — -0.30
1998 1664 132.7 — — — — -29 +97 — 48.4% +0.21 4–6 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 99.2 -0.20 1995 1545 114.4 — — — — +8 -11 +27 40.8% -0.86 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — -0.97
1999 1655 126.4 — — — — +7 +43 -46 45.8% -0.24 5–5 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -0.69 1996 1527 113.8 — — — — +25 — — 33.3% -0.60 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.67
2000 1661 124.8 — — — — +33 -20 -41 48.1% 0.00 5–5 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 98.8 -0.48 1997 1515 100.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.67 0–1 1–0 — +0.13
2001 1619 127.0 — — — — +17 +56 +14 50.6% +0.30 5–8 (38%) 6–4 (60%) 97.9 -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2002 1632 131.4 — — — — 0 +51 -45 44.7% -0.11 8–6 (57%) 3–6 (33%) 100.7 -0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2003 1568 107.0 -0.66 -2.21 0.611 40.9% -12 +39 +86 35.4% -1.04 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 97.2 -0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2004 1571 109.3 -1.05 +2.64 0.990 49.4% — +36 — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1897 144.7 -0.82 -0.27 0.767 44.3% +16 -11 -47 50.7% +0.17 61–74 (45%) 39–39 (50%) 96.9 -2.27 Career 1625 123.4 — — — — +6 -29 +45 38.2% -0.87 23–24 (49%) 6–16 (27%) 97.8 -1.28

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.