H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Barbara Rittner vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 1-1
Barbara Rittner and Marianne Werdel Witmeyer are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer won the 1993 Schenectady third round 6-3 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 1993* | Schenectady | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 6-3 3-6 6-1 | Barbara Rittner | Match data |
| Aug 29, 1992* | Schenectady | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Barbara Rittner | 6-1 (ret.) | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Rittner | #438 | #24 | 661 | 1,883 | 209 | 217 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Barbara Rittner | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1990 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #29 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #34 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #40 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #71 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #66 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #59 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #99 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #68 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #66 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 2003 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #235 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |