H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Barbara Rittner vs Natasha Zvereva H2H: 1-2

Natasha Zvereva holds a 2–1 lead over Barbara Rittner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Natasha Zvereva leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Natasha Zvereva won the 1996 Manhattan Beach third round 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Barbara Rittner
GER Age 53 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Natasha Zvereva
BLR Age 55 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 15, 1996* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 R32 Hard Natasha Zvereva #28 6-2 7-5 Barbara Rittner #64 Match data
Apr 1, 1994* Hilton Head WTA 1000 R16 Clay Natasha Zvereva #12 6-4 6-4 Barbara Rittner #37 Match data
Mar 5, 1993* Delray Beach WTA 250 R16 Hard Barbara Rittner #34 6-3 6-1 Natasha Zvereva #21 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Barbara Rittner #438 #24 661 1,883 209 217 49.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Natasha Zvereva #201 #5 1,820 2,073 388 232 62.6% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbara Rittner Natasha Zvereva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1986 4–2 66.7% #94 1,575 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1987 21–11 65.6% #19 1,831 0 0
17 1990 3–3 50.0% #110 1,557 0 0 1988 38–17 69.1% #7 1,991 0 0
18 1991 20–17 54.1% #43 1,708 0 0 1989 23–17 57.5% #27 1,802 0 0
19 1992 23–15 60.5% #29 1,829 0 1 1990 38–15 71.7% #12 1,955 0 2
20 1993 24–17 58.5% #34 1,838 0 1 1991 29–18 61.7% #21 1,912 0 2
21 1994 25–18 58.1% #40 1,818 0 1 1992 32–19 62.7% #23 1,977 0 2
22 1995 17–17 50.0% #51 1,728 0 1 1993 37–19 66.1% #19 1,972 0 2
23 1996 12–16 42.9% #47 1,728 0 1 1994 29–12 70.7% #10 1,978 0 3
24 1997 10–17 37.0% #71 1,653 0 1 1995 31–17 64.6% #14 1,971 0 3
25 1998 13–14 48.1% #66 1,664 0 1 1996 11–12 47.8% #57 1,877 0 3
26 1999 15–18 45.5% #59 1,655 0 1 1997 25–20 55.6% #25 1,902 0 3
27 2000 10–12 45.5% #99 1,661 0 1 1998 35–21 62.5% #16 1,932 0 4
28 2001 16–18 47.1% #68 1,618 0 2 1999 24–19 55.8% #27 1,824 0 5
29 2002 14–19 42.4% #66 1,632 0 2 2000 11–12 47.8% #78 1,759 0 5
30 2003 6–14 30.0% #120 1,568 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2004 1–2 33.3% #235 1,571 0 2 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,733 0 5