H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Barbara Rittner vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 2-0

Barbara Rittner holds a 2–0 lead over Sandra Cecchini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Barbara Rittner leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbara Rittner won the 1993 US Open second round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Barbara Rittner
GER Age 53 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 2, 1993* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Barbara Rittner #40 6-1 6-2 Sandra Cecchini #33 Match data
Feb 6, 1992* Essen WTA 250 R32 Carpet Barbara Rittner #42 6-2 6-4 Sandra Cecchini #28 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Barbara Rittner #438 #24 661 1,883 209 217 49.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,937 299 215 58.2% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbara Rittner Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1990 3–3 50.0% #110 1,557 0 0 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,485 0 0
18 1991 20–17 54.1% #43 1,708 0 0 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,497 0 0
19 1992 23–15 60.5% #29 1,829 0 1 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1993 24–17 58.5% #34 1,838 0 1 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1994 25–18 58.1% #40 1,818 0 1 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,635 0 3
22 1995 17–17 50.0% #51 1,728 0 1 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,860 0 5
23 1996 12–16 42.9% #47 1,728 0 1 1988 34–14 70.8% #21 1,845 0 7
24 1997 10–17 37.0% #71 1,653 0 1 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1998 13–14 48.1% #66 1,664 0 1 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,815 0 9
26 1999 15–18 45.5% #59 1,655 0 1 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,776 0 10
27 2000 10–12 45.5% #99 1,661 0 1 1992 23–15 60.5% #34 1,824 0 11
28 2001 16–18 47.1% #68 1,618 0 2 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,725 0 11
29 2002 14–19 42.4% #66 1,632 0 2 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 2003 6–14 30.0% #120 1,568 0 2 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 2004 1–2 33.3% #235 1,571 0 2 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,629 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,610 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,556 0 11