H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Barbara Schett vs Amanda Coetzer H2H: 2-5

Amanda Coetzer holds a 5–2 lead over Barbara Schett in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Amanda Coetzer leads 4–2 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Amanda Coetzer won the 2003 US Open round of 64 3-6 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Barbara Schett
AUT Age 50 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 5
7 main-draw meetings
Amanda Coetzer
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 158 cm / 5'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amanda Coetzer #16 3-6 7-5 6-2 Barbara Schett #69 Match data Aug 28, 2003* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Amanda Coetzer #22 6-4 6-3 Barbara Schett #38 Match data Jan 15, 2003* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Amanda Coetzer #19 6-3 6-3 Barbara Schett #21 Match data Jan 20, 2002* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Barbara Schett #25 7-6(8) 3-6 6-4 Amanda Coetzer #12 Match data Oct 13, 2000* R16 Zurich Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Amanda Coetzer #11 3-6 6-0 6-3 Barbara Schett #28 Match data Sep 6, 1998* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Barbara Schett #29 6-7 6-4 6-1 Amanda Coetzer #8 Match data Aug 15, 1998* QF Boston Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Amanda Coetzer #18 6-3 6-1 Barbara Schett #82 Match data May 15, 1994* QF Prague Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Barbara Schett #97 #7 2,188 1,976 259 228 53.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Amanda Coetzer #289 #3 3,380 2,052 497 310 61.6% 0 1 0 1 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbara Schett Amanda Coetzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 0–1 0.0% #290 1,486 0 0 1988 3–2 60.0% #152 1,536 0 0
17 1993 4–4 50.0% #137 1,547 0 0 1989 16–13 55.2% #63 1,674 0 0
18 1994 9–14 39.1% #100 1,530 0 0 1990 16–19 45.7% #76 1,662 0 0
19 1995 8–10 44.4% #83 1,584 0 0 1991 15–19 44.1% #68 1,685 0 0
20 1996 23–18 56.1% #32 1,759 0 1 1992 37–16 69.8% #17 1,865 0 0
21 1997 22–20 52.4% #38 1,752 0 2 1993 42–18 70.0% #15 1,994 0 2
22 1998 34–26 56.7% #23 1,822 0 2 1994 38–19 66.7% #18 1,886 0 3
23 1999 46–23 66.7% #8 1,937 0 2 1995 31–22 58.5% #19 1,907 0 3
24 2000 30–23 56.6% #22 1,825 0 3 1996 32–21 60.4% #14 1,855 0 3
25 2001 29–25 53.7% #21 1,759 0 3 1997 60–25 70.6% #4 2,014 0 5
26 2002 24–20 54.5% #40 1,751 0 3 1998 32–23 58.2% #17 1,888 0 6
27 2003 15–24 38.5% #76 1,625 0 3 1999 37–25 59.7% #11 1,816 0 6
28 2004 14–18 43.8% #90 1,574 0 3 2000 47–23 67.1% #12 1,894 0 7
29 2005 1–1 50.0% #97 1,576 0 3 2001 32–21 60.4% #19 1,786 0 8
30 — — — — — — — 2002 30–22 57.7% #21 1,794 0 8
31 — — — — — — — 2003 27–19 58.7% #25 1,738 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 2004 2–3 40.0% #286 1,718 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Barbara Schett Amanda Coetzer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1991 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1992 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
17 1993 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1989 7 5 12 58.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
18 1994 2 7 9 22.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1990 11 11 22 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1995 2 4 6 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
20 1996 6 7 13 46.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1992 20 8 28 71.4% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1997 5 8 13 38.5% 15 8 23 65.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1993 25 8 33 75.8% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
22 1998 14 11 25 56.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1994 21 11 32 65.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 1999 25 12 37 67.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1995 14 11 25 56.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
24 2000 13 13 26 50.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1996 25 12 37 67.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
25 2001 18 15 33 54.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1997 22 13 35 62.9% 27 7 34 79.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4%
26 2002 13 11 24 54.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1998 16 11 27 59.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0%
27 2003 7 13 20 35.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1999 23 14 37 62.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
28 2004 8 10 18 44.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2000 19 12 31 61.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
29 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 13 11 24 54.2% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 20 13 33 60.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 17 11 28 60.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 114 112 226 50.4% 102 73 175 58.3% 12 12 24 50.0% 31 31 62 50.0% — 265 165 430 61.6% 165 83 248 66.5% 23 24 47 48.9% 44 38 82 53.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Barbara Schett Amanda Coetzer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1991 1492 101.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1992 1487 104.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.21 1988 1537 112.0 — — — — — +42 — 63.6% +0.55 0–1 — — +0.21
17 1993 1547 118.8 — — — — +14 +19 — 45.0% -0.25 3–1 (75%) 2–0 — -0.73 1989 1674 132.8 — — — — -18 -17 -126 56.3% +0.50 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 99.4 -0.21
18 1994 1531 115.7 — — — — +14 +72 — 44.9% -0.65 3–4 (43%) 5–3 (63%) 102.0 +0.38 1990 1662 126.6 — — — — +9 -10 -107 44.4% -0.53 7–4 (64%) 1–4 (20%) 102.4 -1.00
19 1995 1585 128.8 — — — — -34 +53 — 46.3% +0.24 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 96.2 -0.72 1991 1685 139.7 — — — — -8 -8 -103 44.6% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 99.5 -1.77
20 1996 1759 146.4 — — — — -85 +20 — 54.6% +0.42 10–7 (59%) 1–6 (14%) 103.2 -1.38 1992 1865 153.9 — — — — -32 +16 — 64.1% +1.07 10–5 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.2 +0.99
21 1997 1752 144.0 — — — — -105 +101 — 53.3% +0.26 7–9 (44%) 6–2 (75%) 102.6 +0.55 1993 1994 160.0 — — — — +10 -32 -406 65.4% +0.99 9–5 (64%) 4–10 (29%) 99.0 +1.59
22 1998 1822 150.4 — — — — -60 +37 — 58.2% +0.72 7–14 (33%) 7–7 (50%) 94.3 -1.19 1994 1886 153.6 — — — — -4 +95 -255 65.1% +1.19 7–8 (47%) 5–4 (56%) 95.9 +1.72
23 1999 1937 163.4 — — — — -17 -70 -291 62.7% +1.08 13–9 (59%) 8–9 (47%) 101.1 -0.50 1995 1907 160.6 — — — — 0 +74 — 53.3% +0.22 13–7 (65%) 4–3 (57%) 103.6 -2.38
24 2000 1825 147.2 — — — — +26 +52 — 58.5% +0.52 9–12 (43%) 4–7 (36%) 90.3 +1.95 1996 1856 161.7 — — — — +2 +111 — 60.2% +0.94 5–7 (42%) 5–5 (50%) 95.1 -0.79
25 2001 1760 148.2 — — — — +23 +63 -107 53.2% +0.46 8–8 (50%) 7–9 (44%) 95.6 -0.61 1997 2014 167.3 — — — — -43 +103 — 64.8% +1.14 18–7 (72%) 10–7 (59%) 107.6 +0.54
26 2002 1752 138.0 — — — — +9 +19 — 54.5% +0.35 6–7 (46%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 +0.34 1998 1888 157.3 — — — — +20 +176 -212 56.7% +0.43 9–10 (47%) 6–4 (60%) 95.1 +0.82
27 2003 1625 120.3 +0.36 -0.33 0.971 49.1% -22 +119 — 40.7% -0.78 6–7 (46%) 3–5 (38%) 96.2 -0.90 1999 1816 156.1 — — — — +61 +90 -116 53.8% +0.19 16–7 (70%) 7–7 (50%) 101.8 +0.50
28 2004 1575 114.7 -0.23 -0.21 0.988 49.7% +19 +86 +31 43.8% -0.29 5–6 (45%) 1–4 (20%) 94.9 +0.88 2000 1895 157.2 — — — — -11 +100 -198 65.4% +1.19 8–10 (44%) 9–5 (64%) 97.8 +0.42
29 2005 1577 100.5 +0.57 +0.30 0.850 47.5% — — — 40.0% -1.20 1–0 — — +0.22 2001 1786 143.1 — — — — -8 +200 -64 56.5% +0.63 12–8 (60%) 7–5 (58%) 99.6 +2.01
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1795 147.3 — — — — +44 +76 -128 57.0% +0.36 7–5 (58%) 4–3 (57%) 102.2 +1.05
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1739 139.6 +0.81 +0.45 0.979 49.4% +19 +138 -49 54.6% +0.36 11–5 (69%) 4–5 (44%) 101.8 +0.51
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1718 114.7 -0.37 +1.49 1.105 52.2% +32 — — 36.4% -0.36 1–0 — — -0.28
Career — 1977 148.8 +0.18 -0.20 0.959 49.1% -17 +47 -124 53.4% +0.32 80–87 (48%) 48–61 (44%) 91.7 -0.42 — 2052 159.5 +0.47 +0.75 1.018 50.2% +4 +80 -161 58.5% +0.63 138–98 (58%) 73–67 (52%) 100.2 +0.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.