H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Barbara Schett vs Anne Kremer H2H: 2-0

Barbara Schett holds a 2–0 lead over Anne Kremer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Barbara Schett leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbara Schett won the 1999 Hilton Head second round 6-1 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Barbara Schett
AUT Age 50 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Anne Kremer
LUX Age 50 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 31, 1999* Hilton Head WTA 1000 R64 Clay Barbara Schett #19 6-1 7-6 Anne Kremer #44 Match data
Mar 21, 1999* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R32 Hard Barbara Schett #20 6-4 6-2 Anne Kremer #52 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Barbara Schett #97 #7 2,188 1,975 256 227 53.0% 0 0 0 1 2 3
Anne Kremer #1,039 #18 1,265 1,810 147 182 44.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbara Schett Anne Kremer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 0–1 0.0% #290 1,487 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 4–4 50.0% #137 1,547 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1994 9–14 39.1% #100 1,531 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1995 8–10 44.4% #83 1,585 0 0 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0
20 1996 23–18 56.1% #32 1,759 0 1 1996 2–4 33.3% #134 1,509 0 0
21 1997 22–20 52.4% #38 1,762 0 2 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,510 0 0
22 1998 34–26 56.7% #23 1,822 0 2 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,553 0 0
23 1999 46–23 66.7% #8 1,936 0 2 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,641 0 0
24 2000 27–22 55.1% #22 1,815 0 3 2000 27–24 52.9% #33 1,705 0 2
25 2001 29–25 53.7% #21 1,757 0 3 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2
26 2002 24–20 54.5% #40 1,750 0 3 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,670 0 2
27 2003 15–24 38.5% #76 1,624 0 3 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,634 0 2
28 2004 14–18 43.8% #90 1,590 0 3 2004 12–14 46.2% #94 1,620 0 2
29 2005 1–1 50.0% #97 1,591 0 3 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,526 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,530 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,519 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,461 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,475 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2