H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Barbara Schett vs Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario H2H: 3-4

Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario holds a 4–3 lead over Barbara Schett in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario won the 2000 Los Angeles third round 6-4 6-1.

AUT Age 50 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 4
7 main draw meetings
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 10, 2000* Los Angeles WTA 500 R32 Hard Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #10 6-4 6-1 Barbara Schett #18 Match data
Jun 6, 2000* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #9 0-6 6-4 6-2 Barbara Schett #17 Match data
Jan 25, 2000* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #15 1-6 6-0 7-5 Barbara Schett #9 Match data
Nov 15, 1999 WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals R16 Carpet Barbara Schett #8 6-1 6-4 Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #16 Match data
Jan 22, 1999* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Barbara Schett #20 6-2 6-2 Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #5 Match data
Jan 16, 1999* Sydney WTA 500 QF Hard Barbara Schett #24 1-6 6-1 6-0 Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #4 Match data
May 15, 1997* Berlin WTA 1000 R32 Clay Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #6 6-2 4-6 7-5 Barbara Schett #35 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Barbara Schett #97 #7 2,188 1,975 256 227 53.0% 0 0 0 1 2 3
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #52 #1 3,768 2,385 708 267 72.6% 4 7 0 1 17 29

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbara Schett Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1986 15–10 60.0% #81 1,620 0 0
15 1991 0–1 0.0% 1,491 0 0 1987 12–13 48.0% #54 1,639 0 0
16 1992 0–1 0.0% #290 1,487 0 0 1988 31–15 67.4% #18 1,809 0 1
17 1993 4–4 50.0% #137 1,547 0 0 1989 47–13 78.3% #5 2,068 1 3
18 1994 9–14 39.1% #100 1,531 0 0 1990 38–14 73.1% #7 2,081 1 5
19 1995 8–10 44.4% #83 1,585 0 0 1991 56–15 78.9% #5 2,166 1 6
20 1996 23–18 56.1% #32 1,759 0 1 1992 59–15 79.7% #4 2,288 1 8
21 1997 22–20 52.4% #38 1,762 0 2 1993 72–14 83.7% #2 2,248 1 12
22 1998 34–26 56.7% #23 1,822 0 2 1994 69–9 88.5% #2 2,333 3 20
23 1999 46–23 66.7% #8 1,936 0 2 1995 47–13 78.3% #3 2,156 3 22
24 2000 27–22 55.1% #22 1,815 0 3 1996 52–16 76.5% #3 2,106 3 24
25 2001 29–25 53.7% #21 1,757 0 3 1997 45–22 67.2% #9 2,022 3 24
26 2002 24–20 54.5% #40 1,750 0 3 1998 47–17 73.4% #4 2,039 4 26
27 2003 15–24 38.5% #76 1,624 0 3 1999 25–17 59.5% #17 1,932 4 27
28 2004 14–18 43.8% #90 1,590 0 3 2000 38–18 67.9% #8 1,930 4 27
29 2005 1–1 50.0% #97 1,591 0 3 2001 34–22 60.7% #17 1,795 4 29
30 2002 21–24 46.7% #53 1,634 4 29